Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So many dongles... what do those pictures remind me of?

That's right....
Mac-PC.jpg

Funny how things change.

Ever heard of the terms 'misrepresentative' or 'false equivalency'? Nice attempt at flaming, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: leroypants
By the way, on another forum, I saw this:


"After the Hello Again event, a friend sent me a vid in which SJ talks about Xerox and "Toner Heads" and how he thinks that Apple now suffers from the same disease:

YJJhJ5jl.jpg

I came across this pic today on twitter: all the dongles that Apple sells. A lot of the functionality that your computer used to be able to do has now been delegated to expensive dongles.

Apple's now run by "Dongle Heads".
"

LMAO at Dongle Heads!!!!! And Apple should rename their Apple Stores to Adapter Stores.

Great vid! Well found
 
That this is a great Air update... but not, in any sense, the Pro machine it was. It's an Air at Pro+ prices.

It's also taken the worst premium-line keyboard there is - the Macbook - and slapped it on replacing one of the best-in-class - the old Pro board. If you take the 4 or 5 manufacturers who now make premium level machines... this release is internally behind the rest's released machines... in their previous generation.

It's seriously threatening Apple's two computer niches: students and creative professionals: the former priced out and with much better 2016 options (the Surface/XPS lines), and the latter actually being seduced by Microsoft after 3 years of complete neglect by Apple (after spending years wooing them).

Now you're just making things up.

These are still Pro machines by any stretch of the imagination. The entry-level 13" model is meant as a replacement for the 13" Air, so it has the 15w processor of the old Air. The same processor that is used in about 95% of PC's used for 'professional' applications. The more expensive models all still use the 28w/47w parts and the 15" dedicated GPU's that are designed with professional applications in mind rather than gaming or benchmarks. There are few PC's that use these parts, and they all have their own set of compromises. The 47w part especially is true mobile workstation class. The number of PC's using that part is very small. And none of the competition has anywhere near as much available bandwidth as these new machines - maybe not even half of what these have.

The keyboard is a matter of opinion. I happen to think it's better than the old one - and this is coming from someone very particular about keyboards, with custom desktop boards costing hundreds of dollars, and a Thinkpad user for many years in large part for their keyboards. Mac keyboards have been average at best for years. They are too soft without much feedback and lots of backlight bleed. The new board has extremely positive engagement and excellent backlight control. They will continue to refine this and it will be fine.

Lastly, with a few exceptions, Mac laptops have always been premium devices, with prices to reflect that. This is nothing new.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CZ9MM and FreshBoy
Can some one explain to me what the hell is up with this pricing other than it being a bunch of crap? Where is the .5m USB-C cable for $19 too...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0096.PNG
    IMG_0096.PNG
    545.6 KB · Views: 80
What I don't understand is why they didn't add a female lighting port so that iPhone 7/7+ users don't have to carry two sets of earphones.

Well the idea is the lightning headphones with the iPhone are just a stopgap until the AirPods come out in October. Then you use the AirPods with the phone and crapbook pro.

Of course now Apple's screwed up the AirPods just like everything else Timmy touches.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huck
What I don't understand is why they didn't add a female lighting port so that iPhone 7/7+ users don't have to carry two sets of earphones.

Probably because lightning is being replaced by USB C next year.
[doublepost=1478048356][/doublepost]
the most important one

Oh, you dun did it now, boi.
[doublepost=1478048627][/doublepost]
What a joke. Up yours Apple....

No u
[doublepost=1478048826][/doublepost]
this company is a joke, thats it , after this year I will never buying anything from them

Good riddance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FreshBoy
Ever heard of the terms 'misrepresentative' or 'false equivalency'? Nice attempt at flaming, though.
How is that flaming at all? That same image was used in the past decade to make fun of PC users. He's quite right posting that same image again considering the Surface lineup is way more sleek than the Mac lineup, and it doesn't require a handful of dongles and adapters.
 
I calculated that assuming i buy everything from apple store i need 120 bucks worth of dongles and cables just to put me in the same state as i am with 2014 rMBP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Suckfest 9001
Probably because lightning is being replaced by USB C next year.
[doublepost=1478048356][/doublepost]

Oh, you dun did it now, boi.
[doublepost=1478048627][/doublepost]

No u
[doublepost=1478048826][/doublepost]

Good riddance.
We don't need this kind of posting. Stop.
 
And this is why you are not Tim Cook.
Apple has usage metrics on all their products. Now if their metrics say the majority of laptop users NEVER use ethernet, why include it ?

Seems there are 2 choices, those that need ethernet spend a few dollars to get it
OR
the majority get forced into paying for something they will never use.

Get used to the idea that you are NOT in the majority, your individual needs CAN be met, its up to you to buy the cables YOU need.

Sorry, Timmy doesn't have all the metrics. I always set up Macs for myself and others to not send information in to Apple.


FWIW. Belkin has a TB3 dock coming out that seems to have both the power and flexibility to be a good docking / charging station.

http://www.belkin.com/us/p/P-F4U095/

Edit: 170W ps with 85W available for charging

It still doesn't provide enough power for the new MBPs.


Because this was so much better, right? /s

Yep. No need for adapters. I would still use all those wires now, but with adapters in between. So much more elegant with adapters, right?

If there were even one USB-A port, there would be little incentive to make anything for USB-C. People would still complain that their old TB2 devices don't work, or how they need more than one USB-A.

The point is that by forcing the issue, just as they did in 1998 when they dropped EVERY legacy port in favor of (ironically) USB-A, they encourage the rest of the market to adopt USB-C and move on to a superior port.

Otherwise it winds up like Windows where there is a complete alphabet soup of ports and PC notebooks shipping to this day with VGA and Ethernet ports.

Oh come on. That's nonsense. If your statement is true, the USB-C revolution is already dead. Windows PCs make up ~90% of all PCs and 99% have USB-A. Claiming Apple's decision whether or not to include one USB-A port will determine the future of USB-C is a hugely exaggerated overstatement.
 
I calculated that assuming i buy everything from apple store i need 120 bucks worth of dongles and cables just to put me in the same state as i am with 2014 rMBP.

If you're not ready to step up to a modern laptop, simply keep using your 2014 MBP.

Problem solved.
 
Idk maybe it's because I'm getting too old or maybe it's because I've had to "suffer" thru many iterations of technological advances.

Sure it'd be wonderful if Apple was perfect and every design and tech decision allowed for easy transitions into new tech. But the world and Apple aren't perfect. And transitions can be painful.

This was life with a PowerBook G3 circa 1998

IMG_1870.JPG


You had modules that plugged into your PowerBook instead of dongles. You had batteries, cd, floppy, zip and only 2 could be used at the same time.

So if you wanted to work without a plug. You were swapping out the other 3 regularly. As the battery took up one port.

You had PCMCIA cards for everything. Dial up modem, FireWire, ethernet, various camera and memory cards etc. but you could only use one at a time.

As time went forward each of these modules became built in, batteries became built in, ports became built in. But this was the sacrifice "we" made during transitional times.

These were the dongles of yesteryear. So if all I had to carry around was a tiny docking station to have connectivity during a transition. I'd be ecstatic. It's a matter of perspective.

Not saying there aren't legitimate arguements to be made or that in 2016 there couldn't be different paths that could have been taken.

Just saying there are always points in tech advancement where peripheral interfaces become "legacy" and some form of adapter becomes the crossover interface to the modern interface.

Right now Apple is making the decision that anything that's not using the USB-C form factor will be a legacy interface in the very near future. You will need adapters to support interface the peripherals that aren't.

Is change painless? Not a chance. Will it simplify everything going forward. Absolutely.

I for one don't miss changing network id's on daisy chained scsi peripherals trying to find that magic recipe that allowed all the devices to work until they didn't because you moved one cable or added another device. I don't miss the massive VGA cable or CRT's. I don't miss ADB, ADC, ADC to DVI adapter, the various FireWire flavors or the 30 pin connector.

I won't miss fighting with USB-A or watching hdmi, lightning (though that may be the last to go) or the 3.5mm jack die horrible technology deaths.

I for one welcome our new USB-C and whatever 802.11x flavor is popular with the kids that month overlords.

But dongles and docks I'll take over modules and expansion cards any day. If the worst problems in our lives is we need a adapter of some sort to use a legacy peripheral. Then I think we all are having a pretty decent life.

But after literally reading every post in this thread. You'd think the apocalypse had started and Tim Cook was kicking puppies with Jony Ive was critiquing his form.

The new mbp may be for you. Maybe it isn't. But damn. Things can always be worse. Besides some of the issues are process related with intel and die shrinks.

It wasn't too long ago when Apple faced a similar situation with the 970 and G5 Mac Pro. You know. When it literally shipped with a radiator and liquid cooling. That drove Apple to intel. They were ready. OS X was already ported and ready to go.

If intel keeps having issues and amd isn't a viable alternative. I do not doubt there are plans already underway to either create a hybrid x86/arm solution or full arm transition. I don't see Apple subjecting themselves to the G5 fiasco for very long if there's a technical solution that's feasible.

Enjoy the technical revolution you live in and relax. Life's too short to get worked up over dongles :)
 
Its going in a direction you dont like.
And instead of charging ALL users for ports they will never use, they charge the few people who need them, and because USB-C is a standard, you a free to buy them from anyone who makes them, this is NOT apple propriety, and given that Apple charges more than other places they are unlikely to see a dime from the majority of cable sales.
USB A is the standard everyone uses today your argument is completely wrong. As the other guy replied. It is not used by few it used by tons and the immediate price cuts and dismal upcoming sales will dictate this.
 
How is that flaming at all? That same image was used in the past decade to make fun of PC users. He's quite right posting that same image again considering the Surface lineup is way more sleek than the Mac lineup, and it doesn't require a handful of dongles and adapters.

Your post is so at odds with reality, it's hard to believe you're making it in good faith.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KPOM
Oh come on. That's nonsense. If your statement is true, the USB-C revolution is already dead. Windows PCs make up ~90% of all PCs and 99% have USB-A. Claiming Apple's decision whether or not to include one USB-A port will determine the future of USB-C is a hugely exaggerated overstatement.

My point is that by going "all-in" they are making a bold statement that USB-C should be the present, and not a distant future, similar to the statement that Apple made in 1998 when they adopted USB-A in the first place. Apple didn't put in a series of USB-A ports and leave one ADB port in the iMac to ease the transition. The iMac went all-in on USB, and then the Pro models followed thereafter. Last year the MacBook (consumer) went all-in on USB-C, and this year the MacBook Pro followed with a more powerful version.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ankaa
Sorry, Timmy doesn't have all the metrics. I always set up Macs for myself and others to not send information in to Apple.




It still doesn't provide enough power for the new MBPs.




Yep. No need for adapters. I would still use all those wires now, but with adapters in between. So much more elegant with adapters, right?



Oh come on. That's nonsense. If your statement is true, the USB-C revolution is already dead. Windows PCs make up ~90% of all PCs and 99% have USB-A. Claiming Apple's decision whether or not to include one USB-A port will determine the future of USB-C is a hugely exaggerated overstatement.

If those 2W's are a deal breaker for you. Then you are right. There are no solutions in existence and the MBP is going to bring nothing but sorrow into your life. :p
 
How is that flaming at all? That same image was used in the past decade to make fun of PC users. He's quite right posting that same image again considering the Surface lineup is way more sleek than the Mac lineup, and it doesn't require a handful of dongles and adapters.
I think the surface book is an awful looking machine. That's just my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KPOM
USB A is the standard everyone uses today your argument is completely wrong. As the other guy replied. It is not used by few it used by tons and the immediate price cuts and dismal upcoming sales will dictate this.
We'll see. I think we will see price cuts in the future, but a lot of consumers will be attracted to the new features and won't mind a few adapters in the interim.
 
The irony is that so many of you are so caught up in the group-think here that you can't see that long-term, the new Thunderbolt 3 ports will greatly streamline connectivity on the MBP. Those of you who still want your HDMI, mDP, usb-a, magsafe, etc. would have a mass of cables connected to both sides of the MacBook any time you were set up with all these peripherals. With Thunderbolt 3 you can have a dock hidden away and 1 clean cable connecting to the laptop. Even cleaner than the iMac in the picture.

How do you know?

For all anybody knows, some company will introduce a port/tech next year that has nothing to do with USB that the tech world will latch on to.

4 USB c ports and nothing else was too soon.

I hope they suffer for this pitiful decision.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.