So, Consumer Reports, an independent product testing company with decades of experience performing these kinds of tests on similar devices isn't qualified?
And you're complaining about other people being apologists??
Yes, because with the test there should have been a larger sample of phones and they should have tested each phone at different locations.
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/news/2014/09/consumer-reports-tests-iphone-6-bendgate/index.htm
"All the phones we tested showed themselves to be pretty tough. The iPhone 6 Plus, the more robust of the new iPhones in our testing, started to deform when we reached 90 pounds of force, and came apart with 110 pounds of force. With those numbers, it slightly outperformed the HTC One (which is largely regarded as a sturdy, solid phone), as well as the smaller iPhone 6, yet underperformed some other smart phones."
Their claim is based on the fact that the HTC One is regarded as sturdy or on another opinion
What is the minimum force that a phone should have in order not to bend? The consumer reports that apple uses 55lbs to test the phones. If that is apples standard we could see the next iPhone being almost another 50% weaker.
Surf monkey can you or any other person that knows? Tell me what the minimum force that a device should withstand?
30 lbs
35 lbs
40 lbs
45 lbs
50 lbs
55 lbs
60 lbs
65 lbs
70 lbs
If apple standard is 55lbs that leaves a 27% buffer for the 6
The Note 3 has around a 200% buffer