Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Put us all out of our misery mods, close this thread. Absolutely no productive discussion is happening here. And the divisive way Monkey refutes any point is nauseating.
 
Put us all out of our misery mods, close this thread. Absolutely no productive discussion is happening here. And the divisive way Monkey refutes any point is nauseating.

Please don't launch attacks on me for no reason. I haven't been divisive. I've tried to be as open and accommodating as possible. The vitriol has largely been directed at me, not the other way around.
 
Please don't launch attacks on me for no reason. I haven't been divisive. I've tried to be as open and accommodating as possible. The vitriol has largely been directed at me, not the other way around.

Your response is exactly what I mean. Buy hey, I understand, arguing on the internet is entertaining. It is why I read half of these threads. :D This one is just over. Nothing more will be achieved in this discussion until Apple admits to an issues.

Which by the way, I live in Portland as well. When they do admit to the issue, I won't ask for your life savings, but I will take a beer!
 
Your response is exactly what I mean. Buy hey, I understand, arguing on the internet is entertaining. It is why I read half of these threads. :D This one is just over. Nothing more will be achieved in this discussion until Apple admits to an issues.

Which by the way, I live in Portland as well. When they do admit to the issue, I won't ask for your life savings, but I will take a beer!

My response in no way justifies your attack on me. Please refrain from that kind of behavior in the future. It isn't appropriate.
 
Besides aluminium alloy behaves just like any other metall - it fatigue from stress with time.

People have alleged bending under "normal" usage after 2 days.

It is a really good thing that millions and millions of people are not using their phones under "normal" conditions, otherwise the number of returns and posts here would be through the roof.

Do you really think that people subject their devices to so much stress over time that it causes metal fatigue? Seriously?

If you want to actually understand fatigue in aluminum, here ya go:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471531700000080
 
Dangerous game you'll play because soon some media, be it macrumors or er al. Will publish a story about how the online ordering system was relentlessly exploited by a few people, and thousands of UDP lines created out of thin air, people making 10k selling phones that are in high demand. this will be picked up by gawker, dead spin, and the mainstream media.

Verizon will then use this as a precedence to either begin kicking off people on their UDP for fraud and exploiting their services and businesses and/or permanently throttling UDP.

So in effect all these guys exploiting the ordering system are just watering down their already precious UDP and just giving Verizon a backdoor exit to kick us all off.

Its fun for now, until the 100-500 people who are constantly exploiting this make their 1-10k, and the 2,000,000 of us on UDP are left holding their bag and forced to sweep up this mess.

Can I get the english version:cool:
 
Because it will take less that 70/90 lbs to bend the IPhone at its weakest spot. Just like 4 pencil will bend with less force in there weakest configuration.

I know you know the answer you are just pretending to not know.

Can you explain why 2 GB of ram has improved the Safari reload issue dramatically. You said that they would behave exactly the same?

You see its common sense which you lack.

Before you will move the goal post again. If bad programming was the cause, would have no bearing if apple did not fix the issue for an entire year. That FACT is, more RAM helped which you said it would not.
Who says it takes less than 70 lbs? You? Actually in CR test it bent in the weakest point exactly at 70 lbs

----------

Lads, it has been already tested at weak spot:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9X0Xglp1IJQ

You could see both iphones are bending just under 10 kg (23 lbs) stress.

After this test Bild was banned from apple events.

It looks like you should put iphone in a pocket heads down to minimize stress of the weak point.

I can't understand German, but nowhere in that video I can see any reference to 10 kg of force.
Btw the test is pointless since it is applying full force on the single spot. Hardly a real case scenario unless you put two thumbs pushing on the weak spot like the idiots YouTubers did.
Even in that case the phone bent at over 30 kg (☺ near the 70 lbs)

----------

Exactly, that's called material fatigue - you could stress your iphone 6 many times with moderate force (10 kg) but eventually material will fatigue and you could have a bend.

Metal fatigue? You need a reality check: it is a frakkin phone, not a torsion bar. It's meant to be used to make phone calls and slightly tap on the screen.

----------

i just watched the video. it started deforming as early as 100 Newtons.

Omg.... It's aluminum! Planes are made of aluminum. Even cars. It's SUPPOSED to deform, and then regain its shape. The test stop when the deformation reach a defined level, and it is above 290 N, even if they applied force on a single stop, a totally unrealistic scenario.

----------

That's 23 lbs force and iphone is clearly bending. If you stop at this point it probably would return to normal shape. But with time you could get bend phone because of material fatigue.

Every frakkin elastic material is supposed to behave in that way! If it was completely rigid it would crack easily.
It's not supposed to be subject of metal fatigue, it is A PHONE! It could happen, once in a while, to sustain that kind of force, and it is able to resist to that, but if you are applying that kind of pressure you are just looking for troubles.
And the reportedly bent iPhones had a few days of life, so your absurd theory is pointless: they just say on it, and it bent. Not metal fatigue. Just careless behavior.

----------

It didn't permanently bend until 313 Newtons. Just like the CR test.

I think we are wasting our time: they are purposely avoiding to understand the tests.
They just want the iPhone to bend to bash Apple about this design choice. Period.

----------

How is 70lbs = 90 Lbs ?

How is that just like the CR test?

You didn't read the cr test, right?

----------

If someone says the put it in their front pocket and another poster asked why did you sit on it? I would consider that a troll statement.

I am in no way accusing you of using that line, but I have seen others use it.

----------



If thats the case, I have missed that fact.

Still waiting for someone showing me how to bend an iPhone on the front pocket.... It's been a month...
 
Who says it takes less than 70 lbs? You? Actually in CR test it bent in the weakest point exactly at 70 lbs

----------



I can't understand German, but nowhere in that video I can see any reference to 10 kg of force.
Btw the test is pointless since it is applying full force on the single spot. Hardly a real case scenario unless you put two thumbs pushing on the weak spot like the idiots YouTubers did.
Even in that case the phone bent at over 30 kg (☺ near the 70 lbs)

----------



Metal fatigue? You need a reality check: it is a frakkin phone, not a torsion bar. It's meant to be used to make phone calls and slightly tap on the screen.

----------



Omg.... It's aluminum! Planes are made of aluminum. Even cars. It's SUPPOSED to deform, and then regain its shape. The test stop when the deformation reach a defined level, and it is above 290 N, even if they applied force on a single stop, a totally unrealistic scenario.

----------



Every frakkin elastic material is supposed to behave in that way! If it was completely rigid it would crack easily.
It's not supposed to be subject of metal fatigue, it is A PHONE! It could happen, once in a while, to sustain that kind of force, and it is able to resist to that, but if you are applying that kind of pressure you are just looking for troubles.
And the reportedly bent iPhones had a few days of life, so your absurd theory is pointless: they just say on it, and it bent. Not metal fatigue. Just careless behavior.

----------



I think we are wasting our time: they are purposely avoiding to understand the tests.
They just want the iPhone to bend to bash Apple about this design choice. Period.

----------



You didn't read the cr test, right?

----------



Still waiting for someone showing me how to bend an iPhone on the front pocket.... It's been a month...

It's impossible to bend it in your front pocket normally. Both most my jeans and my work pants are way too tight as I'm too cheap to buy new ones (keep telling myself I'll lose weight again lol) and I always keep mine in my tight front pockets even while sitting and it never bends at all. Whoever gets theirs bent has to be doing something on purpose or totally outrageous imo.
 
No, why are you lying?

Besides aluminium alloy behaves just like any other metall - it fatigue from stress with time.

----------



You didn't miss a thing:
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/news/2014/09/consumer-reports-tests-iphone-6-bendgate/index.htm

Probably a furious child behind the monitor. :D
Do you have a problem with English comprehension?

All the phones we tested showed themselves to be pretty tough. The iPhone 6 Plus, the more robust of the new iPhones in our testing, started to deform when we reached 90 pounds of force, and came apart with 110 pounds of force. With those numbers, it slightly outperformed the HTC One (which is largely regarded as a sturdy, solid phone), as well as the smaller iPhone 6, yet underperformed some other smart phones.

Below that there is a table showing the iPhone 6 deformation happened at 70 lbs, just like the HTC M8.

----------

If the truth ever surfaced, and it won't... Well you can fill in the blanks.

I'm currently profiting by reselling new iPhone 6 models while demand is strong, but refuse to waste my money on one.

Next year I'll happily buy the new stronger improved model with great peace of mind.

Using the amazingly huge profits I've made off of the first gen iP6 & 6+, my 2015 iPhone will be free with money left over... Thanks Apple.

Are you saying you are a scalper and you are proud of it? :confused:
 
Who says it takes less than 70 lbs? You? Actually in CR test it bent in the weakest point exactly at 70 lbs

----------



I can't understand German, but nowhere in that video I can see any reference to 10 kg of force.
Btw the test is pointless since it is applying full force on the single spot. Hardly a real case scenario unless you put two thumbs pushing on the weak spot like the idiots YouTubers did.
Even in that case the phone bent at over 30 kg (☺ near the 70 lbs)

----------



Metal fatigue? You need a reality check: it is a frakkin phone, not a torsion bar. It's meant to be used to make phone calls and slightly tap on the screen.

----------



Omg.... It's aluminum! Planes are made of aluminum. Even cars. It's SUPPOSED to deform, and then regain its shape. The test stop when the deformation reach a defined level, and it is above 290 N, even if they applied force on a single stop, a totally unrealistic scenario.

----------



Every frakkin elastic material is supposed to behave in that way! If it was completely rigid it would crack easily.
It's not supposed to be subject of metal fatigue, it is A PHONE! It could happen, once in a while, to sustain that kind of force, and it is able to resist to that, but if you are applying that kind of pressure you are just looking for troubles.
And the reportedly bent iPhones had a few days of life, so your absurd theory is pointless: they just say on it, and it bent. Not metal fatigue. Just careless behavior.

----------



I think we are wasting our time: they are purposely avoiding to understand the tests.
They just want the iPhone to bend to bash Apple about this design choice. Period.

----------



You didn't read the cr test, right?

----------



Still waiting for someone showing me how to bend an iPhone on the front pocket.... It's been a month...


That machine measures flexural strength. Basically it simulates a load, and in our case the load point is the axis from which the machine simulates the load placed on a body.

Its a tried and true mechanical engineering test designed to measure exactly what were looking for: when does the iPhone deform such that it can no longer bounce back to its original form, and at point is there catastrophic failure?

You can do multipoint load bearing tests, which is prudent because the iPhone's construction from head to tail is not homogeneous.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Put us all out of our misery mods, close this thread. Absolutely no productive discussion is happening here. And the divisive way Monkey refutes any point is nauseating.

I would say the same about haters keep pushing absurd theories about phone bending, like Apple hired some amateurs instead of high level profile engineers

----------

Your response is exactly what I mean. Buy hey, I understand, arguing on the internet is entertaining. It is why I read half of these threads. :D This one is just over. Nothing more will be achieved in this discussion until Apple admits to an issues.

Which by the way, I live in Portland as well. When they do admit to the issue, I won't ask for your life savings, but I will take a beer!

They are not going to admit an issue doesn't exist....
Don't bend it, it won't bend. Easy like that.

----------

Just FYI this forum has an ignore function. I highly recommend it!

The " head under the sand" behavior is a good one... when you have no valid arguments.
 
After watching the computer bild video, I think the phone fails the test at about 50lbs. At that point you can almost see the oscillated flex of the phone and the phone surely cannot recover to it's original form.

----------

After watching the computer bild video, I think the phone fails the test at about 50lbs. At that point you can almost see the oscillated flex of the phone and at that point the phone surely cannot recover to it's original form.

For the record, I don't think its possible to create an any point stress load of 50lbs on the phone by sitting on it with it in your front pocket. Maybe you'd create 20lbs consistently, but 50 is a stretch
 
It's impossible to bend it in your front pocket normally. Both most my jeans and my work pants are way too tight as I'm too cheap to buy new ones (keep telling myself I'll lose weight again lol) and I always keep mine in my tight front pockets even while sitting and it never bends at all. Whoever gets theirs bent has to be doing something on purpose or totally outrageous imo.

To be honest I would avoid to keep it in my front pocket while seated.
It's not comfortable (the device is big) and risks of hit a table while moving are high.
My two cents.
 
That machine measures flexural strength. Basically it simulates a load, and in our case the load point is the axis from which the machine simulates the load placed on a body.

Its a tried and true mechanical engineering test designed to measure exactly what were looking for: when does the iPhone deform such that it can no longer bounce back to its original form, and at point is there catastrophic failure?

You can do multipoint load bearing tests, which is prudent because the iPhone's construction from head to tail is not homogeneous.

I am an engineer..... and this test is pointless since you are not going to apply force on a single spot in normal usage

It's just a "nice to know" test, and its purpose is purely as a click bait.
Someone believing that Bild has more competence than Apple engineers in that field lives in a parallel dimension

----------

After watching the computer bild video, I think the phone fails the test at about 50lbs. At that point you can almost see the oscillated flex of the phone and the phone surely cannot recover to it's original form.

----------

After watching the computer bild video, I think the phone fails the test at about 50lbs. At that point you can almost see the oscillated flex of the phone and at that point the phone surely cannot recover to it's original form.

For the record, I don't think its possible to create an any point stress load of 50lbs on the phone by sitting on it with it in your front pocket. Maybe you'd create 20lbs consistently, but 50 is a stretch
That's my point since the beginning.
Yes the iPhone 6 is more delicate than previous models.
Yes its weakest point actually is just below the volume buttons, near to the edge of the frame.
NO it isn't a big deal on normal usage because you can't apply force on that single spot unless you are doing it on purpose.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You didn't read the cr test, right?



Can you please show me where in the CR test it says the iPhones 6 PLUS bent (permanently deformed) or might bend (permanently deformed) at 70 pounds of force?

I did read the report and keep missing it.
 
Last edited:
The iPhone 6 plus bent at 90..... The standard 6 at 70 lbs...

did you read the thread then?

Surf Monkey wrote

"Wrong. The Bild test confirmed the CR test. Watch the video. The 6 Plus deforms at 313 Newtons. That's 70lbs of force."

He than goes on to say that CR said that the iPhone 6 PLUS will bend at the volume button at 70 pounds



So ask your buddy if he read the report
 
did you read the thread then?

Surf Monkey wrote

"Wrong. The Bild test confirmed the CR test. Watch the video. The 6 Plus deforms at 313 Newtons. That's 70lbs of force."

He than goes on to say that CR said that the iPhone 6 PLUS will bend at the volume button at 70 pounds



So ask your buddy if he read the report
The Bild test basically confirmed the CR test conclusion, even if numbers are slightly different (the test is different because CR applied a force at the entire frame while Bild did it in a single weak spot).
The conclusions are that you can't bend it unless you are trying hard to do that on purpose
 
I am an engineer..... and this test is pointless since you are not going to apply force on a single spot in normal usage

It's just a "nice to know" test, and its purpose is purely as a click bait.
Someone believing that Bild has more competence than Apple engineers in that field lives in a parallel dimension

----------


That's my point since the beginning.
Yes the iPhone 6 is more delicate than previous models.
Yes its weakest point actually is just below the volume buttons, near to the edge of the frame.
NO it isn't a big deal on normal usage because you can't apply force on that single spot unless you are doing it on purpose.

your an admitted apple shill.

If this wasn't an issue people wouldn't post about their phones bending.

But you don't care. Because you have to defend apple no matter what. Why? Whats in it for you?
 
The Bild test basically confirmed the CR test conclusion, even if numbers are slightly different (the test is different because CR applied a force at the entire frame while Bild did it in a single weak spot).
The conclusions are that you can't bend it unless you are trying hard to do that on purpose

Don't change the subject

Where does the CR test mention the the iPhone 6 Plus permanently deforming at 70 LBS, either tested or postulated?

You asked me if I read the report where I asked him to support this claim. He says its in the report from CR.
 
People have alleged bending under "normal" usage after 2 days.

It is a really good thing that millions and millions of people are not using their phones under "normal" conditions, otherwise the number of returns and posts here would be through the roof.

Do you really think that people subject their devices to so much stress over time that it causes metal fatigue? Seriously?

If you want to actually understand fatigue in aluminum, here ya go:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471531700000080
And some claims it bends after couple of weeks.

I don't bother with obvious cases, when you clearly see big impact on the phone, but most questions about slightly bending iphones, wabble thing - it can't be done with a hit or purpose bend, it requires quite gentle and steady pressure to get it like this:

IMG_0017.jpg


Screenshot_2014-10-25-12-35-56.png


And, like I said, material fatigue means you could apply small stress which doesn't break aluminium, but after many cycles it could eventually fatigue, because of material characteristics.

PS Never thought I would do it on this board, but I add two annoying trolls to ignore list.
 
your an admitted apple shill.

If this wasn't an issue people wouldn't post about their phones bending.

But you don't care. Because you have to defend apple no matter what. Why? Whats in it for you?

When you sit on a phone, the issue is in you behavior, not in the device

----------

Don't change the subject

Where does the CR test mention the the iPhone 6 Plus permanently deforming at 70 LBS, either tested or postulated?

You asked me if I read the report where I asked him to support this claim. He says its in the report from CR.

It's not a question of numbers. 70 or 90 doesn't change much.
You didn't read the article about cr stress test and surely not the conclusions.
And the Bild test actually confirmed those conclusions: the iPhone doesn't bend unless you intentionally try.

----------

And some claims it bends after couple of weeks.

I don't bother with obvious cases, when you clearly see big impact on the phone, but most questions about slightly bending iphones, wabble thing - it can't be done with a hit or purpose bend, it requires quite gentle and steady pressure to get it like this:

Image

Image

And, like I said, material fatigue means you could apply small stress which doesn't break aluminium, but after many cycles it could eventually fatigue, because of material characteristics.

PS Never thought I would do it on this board, but I add two annoying trolls to ignore list.
The metal fatigue concept applied to a phone is utterly ridiculous
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.