Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Seriously, is it even possible for the chips to be that different in power consumption? And the Samsung chip is smaller as well, so it should be innately lower in power consumption. At this stage I don't believe this is a real thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Analog Kid
Am I missing something here? If the Samsung based device is running about 22% shorter can that even be explained by difference in chips?

If the A9 accounted for half the power in the phone, doesn't that mean the Samsung is like 50% less efficient? That sounds way outside of quality control limits... The only thing I can imagine causing that is if the Samsung had a bug in its idle mode, which Apple would have had to have known about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kingpushup
Seriously, is it even possible for the chips to be that different in power consumption? And the Samsung chip is smaller as well, so it should be innately lower in power consumption. At this stage I don't believe this is a real thing.
Well it looks like Marco Arment is going to make this a thing.
 
false. it was way exaggerated by media and haters, like usually happen to any apple related issue.

Very first calls I made with it dropped. I returned it the first day before it was "gated". Not false by any means. You are just as bad as those with "blind faith in Samsung" if you can honestly defend Apple on that that one. Or make claims that any related Apple issue is exaggerated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: H2SO4
I'm laughing at all the people that said how glad they were they had a Samsung chip in their phones in the last thread.
 
I am beyond thrilled with my 6S' battery life. I run it from 7:15am until midnight, with quite a bit of usage at work, and it's still on over 25% without using Low Power Mode. That's with YouTube, Facebook (awful app for efficiency), calls, light gaming, Spotify/AM, Bluetooth and web browsing. I'm confident it could do a full 24 hours, with Low Power Mode.

Contrast this to my 5S, which needed charging at about midday, and I'm super happy. In fairness, that battery was consumed and my girlfriend's 5S puts in a great show on battery life too.
 
Very first calls I made with it dropped. I returned it the first day before it was "gated". Not false by any means. You are just as bad as those with "blind faith in Samsung" if you can honestly defend Apple on that that one. Or make claims that any related Apple issue is exaggerated.
I owned it for one year, 13 months, not a single call dropped, and like me millions and millions of happy customers.
Apple sold the iPhone 4 for years.
There is no gate out of forums like this...
 
Antennagate was lame and I really didn't care and it didn't effect me even though I had a 4, bendgate didn't effect me and I had a 6.

But a nearly 25% difference in battery life? That's the kind of stuff class action lawsuits are made of, seriously. This is a much bigger deal than bendgate or antennagate, particularly since it's so easily quantifiable. Far more quantifiable than "I don't get good signal sometimes" or "some phones bend if they're in your pocket a certain way."
iPhone 6s user call to law firm: "Hi, my iPhone battery is worse than others, I want to start a class action suit."

Law Offices of Bendover & Takeit: "your evidence?"

User: "some armchair engineers on the internet said so."

Law Offices of B&T: "LOL"

User: "but I have YouTube videos showing it."

Law Offices of B&O: "LOL"

User: "I tried to return it at the Apple store and they laughed at me. This is negligent infliction of emotional distress on Apple's part!"

Law Offices of B&O: "LOL"

Is how this will go down. This is why there are so many lawyers. (fellow lawyer here). It's because of all the frivolous complaints and BS suits people want to bring. So keep 'em coming! :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: doboy
Am I missing something here? If the Samsung based device is running about 22% shorter can that even be explained by difference in chips?

If the A9 accounted for half the power in the phone, doesn't that mean the Samsung is like 50% less efficient? That sounds way outside of quality control limits... The only thing I can imagine causing that is if the Samsung had a bug in its idle mode, which Apple would have had to have known about.

Heheh, what if Samsung chip sees test .. and revs up!

Oops, test for battery?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NMBob
iPhone 6s user call to law firm: "Hi, my iPhone battery is worse than others, I want to start a class action suit."

Law Offices of Bendover & Takeit: "your evidence?"

User: "some armchair engineers on the internet said so."

Law Offices of B&T: "LOL"

User: "but I have YouTube videos showing it."

Law Offices of B&O: "LOL"

User: "I tried to return it at the Apple store and they laughed at me. This is negligent infliction of emotional distress on Apple's part!"

Law Offices of B&O: "LOL"

Is how this will go down. This is why there are so many lawyers. (fellow lawyer here). It's because of all the frivolous complaints and BS suits people want to bring. So keep 'em coming! :D


You don't need a lawyer. Every single person on this forum has till at least this Friday to return their phones :)
 
I owned it for one year, 13 months, not a single call dropped, and like me millions and millions of happy customers.
Apple sold the iPhone 4 for years.
There is no gate out of forums like this...

We'll you must have been holding it right. Good job. Anyways, off topic so I'll drop it, but you are being totally hypocritical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: H2SO4
Anyone else notice that the TSMC test was done with a SIM inserted and the Samsung one shows "NO SIM". They also left their WIFI on so who knows what is happening on the networking layer which could drastically reduce battery life.
 
Apps cannot run in the background on iOS. They are suspended in RAM, but don't use the CPU/GPU. Some apps can keep running some stuff in background, but that's limited to 15 mins MAX.

I don't know all the details, but I'm baffled by this, I just cannot believe such a difference exists.
 
and two weeks ago EVERYONE in the thread was hoping they'd have the Samsung one assuming it was superior cos Samsung and smaller (and based on no knowledge about anything what so ever, so blind faith)

I have no idea which chip I have, or really care - but my 6s battery is definitely much worse than my 6, which is odd as I thought iOS9 would improve things and i never even bothered to install iOS9 on the 6....

I have a TSMC 6SPlus and the battery life is marginally superior to my old 6Plus. I can use for a solid 12-hour day and still have 30% battery. Plus I am a pretty heavy user who plays games and watches news videos on 3 hours of transit per day. So that speaks heaps to this improvement. My my old 6 Plus I would usually get down to around 15% when I get home.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
We need to do the test on two brand new phones in factory conduction. with a sim from the same carrier and in airplane mode.

Two tests:

1) standby
2) geekbench battery test (under heavy load)

And we need to run on 1000+ devices and then the discussions can start.

Testing two devices only in varying states is not newsworthy.
 
We'll you must have been holding it right. Good job. Anyways, off topic so I'll drop it, but you are being totally hypocritical.
me ? Again, MILLIONS AND MILLIONS of customers for about 4 years.
There are still millions of working iPhone 4 in the wild. And people don't keep a phone that continue to drop calls.
Antennagate was BS.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.