No...just, no. It’s a sophomoric design detail and needs to stay gone.Aside from bringing back MagSafe to the MacBook Pro, I want the Apple logo on the back to light up again
No...just, no. It’s a sophomoric design detail and needs to stay gone.Aside from bringing back MagSafe to the MacBook Pro, I want the Apple logo on the back to light up again
...and 2 fewer TB ports. Not an improvement at all. But apparently necessary.
You're right except for the Mac Pro. I would not expect that until 2022.I actually think we’ll see the redesigned entry-level Apple Silicon iMac this month or next month. And I suspect we’ll see Apple Silicon pro level Macs (iMac Pro, MBP, Mac Pro) in the Fall.
thanks for the PTSD of having unintentionally seen parts of this movie as a kid.
I would expect that for at least a while the current M1 13" MacBook Pro and Air to stay the bottom tier. A 13" MBP at $1300 is going to sell better than a $1800-$2000 14" MBP or a $2400-$2800 16" MBP. I wouldn't be surprised to see that build-to-order options on the two port MBP start to decrease with the introduction of higher end MacBook Pros. We also don't know the cadence for updates for Apple Silicon machines. Is it yearly, every other year, every 18 months? That will likely make a difference with what Apple does moving forward as well.Is the general consensus here on MR that the 13.3" MBP will remain as the bottom tier option with the new 14/16" coming in at higher price points?
I think I would be disappointed because it would represent a change in how Apple thinks and works: design from the ground up not from whatever the old device happens to be. Also ... really waiting for that matte black option 🍸😸My heart is set on the second generation M series iMacs with Face ID. But the question I want to ask those waiting on the 16 inch. What Apple doesn't actually change anything and just release the same Intel based 16 inch chassis, just without a Touch Bar and a couple extra ports but with of course faster M processor. Would you be disappointed?
It will be such a terrible wasted opportunity if it doesn't have it. Face ID is perfect for the iMac. Plenty of space for the sensors, a camera that is always pointed directly at the user (no angle issues), detached keyboards don't have to deal with Touch ID security issues (and who wants to have to reach for the sensor anyway).My heart is set on the second generation M series iMacs with Face ID.
They are gonna squeeze revenue out of first gen redesign, then entice you to upgrade on the second gen for features like Face ID.It will be such a terrible wasted opportunity if it doesn't have it. Face ID is perfect for the iMac. Plenty of space for the sensors, a camera that is always pointed directly at the user (no angle issues), detached keyboards don't have to deal with Touch ID security issues (and who wants to have to reach for the sensor anyway).
Face ID will just work, effortlessly, for an iMac user. No more constantly entering your password for ever-increasing things Apple thinks users need to authenticate for. No more flakey Apple Watch unlock that randomly stops working whenever it feels like it.
There are plenty of hubs with pass through charging that adds more ports.Hope at least one of the redesigned is a sealed/fanless version, so the thermals perform the same regardless of how old or dusty it might get. Similar to the existing Air M1 but with more ports. 2 ports MacBooks are useless as one of the thunderbolt 4 port is just occupied for charging only, what a waste of tech.
Not to mention something as simple as charging from either side. It is a huge step backward.Magsafe charging is a major step backwards, being able to charge everything with a USB-C cable is very convenient, not to mention allows for power banks to be able to charge Macbooks.
Show of hands...Who thinks the MagSafe will be an add-on and it will continue to ship with usb-c power?
Nobody has said that you won’t be able to charge by USB-C when you want to. It’s part of the USB-C specification, and I’m guessing they will continue to allow it.Magsafe charging is a major step backwards, being able to charge everything with a USB-C cable is very convenient, not to mention allows for power banks to be able to charge Macbooks.
Not to mention something as simple as charging from either side. It is a huge step backward.
And I think they know it. All signs point to this move being related to the removal of Thunderbolt ports. Once the Pro machine that has 4 goes down to 2, they need to make up for that somehow. Their answer is adding back legacy ports to fill the gap.
Logically yes
They don't have stock, they even are short on supply
I think whatever Apple comes up with won't be anything like those multi-color 24' iMac screens rumor having edge to edge displays in a recent article. I shudder with that thought.By entry-level, I mean there’s rumours of a redesigned 24” iMac with M1.