This only applies to the numbers of Swiss watches shipped. In terms of value, the exports were even up by 2.6%.Swiss watch market saw a 13% decline in 2019. I mention this year because I don't think it'd be fair to include the pandemic 2020 but they declined even further in that.
Meanwhile the Apple Watch outsold the entire swiss watch market, combined. It would be foolish to think the Apple Watch hasn't harmed the luxury watch market. Everyone is carrying a smart phone so wearing an Apple Watch as 1/4th of all iPhone owners do according to recent data posted here on MacRumors home page would mean it is doing damage.
Also when you consider that the swiss watches are often at the higher end of the market costing several hundred to several thousand dollars and iPhone owners tend to be more affluent than Android owners and the Apple Watch only works with iPhone it tends to do a lot of damage to these luxury watch makers.
Essentially their potential customers are being turned onto functional technology instead of high luxury fashion due to the utility it affords them. That's not to say these luxury watches are dead, far from it. But that 13% decline in 2019 is hard to dismiss as anything but damaging.
Can Apple repeat this success in Cars? I have my doubts, but then I had my doubts about the iPhone, iPad and Apple Watch and I was proven wrong every time.
I don’t think VW has a lot worries about this. Sure, Apple is a respected competitor but I think technology can be bought. And VW AG is not stupid, see with the Porsche Taycan: a tremendous jump in three years to Tesla who is working on this more than a decade. Or Mercedes S-class and autonomous driving. I think German engineering can never be estimated.
Apple is widely rumored to be working on a self-driving car, internally codenamed "Project Titan." Apple reportedly began work on the project in 2014, and years later, the rumor mill is in full swing speculating when Apple will debut its self-driving technology. Speculation has become so rampant that potential competitors to an Apple Car are already weighing down its potential threat to the overall car industry.
![]()
As reported by Reuters today, Volkswagen Group CEO Herbert Diess said that he's "not afraid" of an Apple Car and that Apple will not be able to overtake the $2 trillion automobile industry overnight. In typical Apple fashion, the company has not confirmed it's working on a self-driving car, but Diess believes that the rumors and reports are "logical." Apple has expertise in battery technology, software, and design, and it can easily utilize all of its proficiency in those areas to create an automobile, the CEO was quoted as saying.
Similar remarks can be traced back to 2006, one year prior to the launch of the iPhone, when the CEO of Palm, which at the time was one of the leading smartphone makers, stated that Apple would not "just figure this out," referring to smartphones. In the years that followed, however, the iPhone would captivate the market, eventually leading it to $65 billion in revenue for a single quarter.
Volkswagen, based in Germany, is one of the largest car manufacturers in Europe and around the world, giving it significant dominance over the industry. Diess said he is not concerned that Apple joining the market would disrupt Volkswagen's dominance, saying that despite Apple's expertise in all of the technology needed to create a car, his company is still "not afraid" and that Apple "will not manage" to disrupt the market overnight.
Until this year, very little was known about how Apple would go about building an actual self-driving car. Apple uses third-party suppliers such as TSMC and Foxconn to build current products like the iPhone and Mac, but none of its current suppliers are fully positioned to build an automobile. On that front, Apple is expected to partner with an already well-known and established car maker to fulfill its self-driving car ambitions.
In early January, reports began to surface that Apple was close to inking a deal with Hyundai, after the automaker released a statement confirming that it was in talks with the tech giant. The statement was quickly revoked and reworded to exclude mentions of Apple, and it has since been reported that talks between Hyundai and Apple have grounded to a halt.
Multiple sources have suggested different timeframes for the launch of the Apple Car, with the earliest report suggesting a release as early as 2024. Bloomberg, however, believes that the car is "nowhere near production stage" and that a release is at least five to seven years away.
Article Link: Volkswagen CEO: We're 'Not Afraid' of a Potential 'Apple Car'hat they did with the Porsche
Some of the disagrees on this is odd. Folks that buy Rolexes will not suddenly replace it with Apple Watches. It’s a different market entirely. There’s a reason they buy Rolexes and it’s not simply to tell time.is the same thing with the apple watch....you think Rolex, patek philippe , augmentin pique care about the apple watch success ? or you think they were afraid when the rumored about an apple watch started to appear?
No...and they still dont
So, its ok for competition point of view, nothing more, nothing less
I don't think people in general understand the scale of car manufacturing and the massive supply chain involved.On the other hand look at Tesla selling every single car they produce with 1 year waiting lists on some models due to demand and they've only been selling cars for 10 years, with zero experience beyond what's held in the minds of the employees they hired.
Apple has a big leg up on that by having 10x the size and capital, the ability to hire anyone they want by presenting them with a bucket of cash. If they wanted they could hire the CEO of Volkswagen they have that kind of money.
Fairly sure Blackberry said something similar about Apple smartphones...
And I'm pretty sure Nokia said the same thing about the iPhone...
Why do these companies always do this? They underestimate Apple then just get humiliated when they end up being successful.
Cleverly analysed.There's this one more thing: the iPhone was peak Steve Jobs. This "car" or whatever it will end up to be is gonna be designed by a committee of rotating middle-managers and interns with no singular focus and nowhere near the same obsessive approach to design.
It has become a gambling stock though.i recall folks saying the same about tesla. now its the highest value car company in the world.
Fully agree.Looking back in history and think of what the critics have said
1) iPhone will not take off
2) the iPad won’t work, it’s just a big iPhone
3) people won’t buy the Apple Watch as it’s tied to the phone, it’s a small market that’s dominated by garmen and Fitbit. I get the car domain is big and difficult and hard to break into but remember that Tesla had laid the ground work for charging stations and infrastructure that made their entry to market more difficult. If I was in one of these car companies I would be doing everything I can to try and crush Apple now before it’s too late.
So much for my joke of irony.They have AppleCare, and AppleCare+. They do not use WatchCare or PhoneCare, so I am pretty sure they are ok.![]()
Why do these companies always do this? They underestimate Apple then just get humiliated when they end up being successful.
“putting wheels on a Mac Pro doesn’t make Apple into an automaker.”Why WOULD Volkswagen be afraid of a product that doesn't exist? I could understand if Apple had some working concept vehicle, but apparently, Apple has absolutely nothing worth fearing. Putting wheels on a Mac Pro doesn't make Apple into an automaker.
Well said mateIf they are meaningless, why are you arguing against my point, yet confirming in the same post that Apple uses contract manufacturing? Customers owning the equipment manufacturers use to build their products is not unique to the Foxconn / Apple relationship. It is a neat CapEX trick that Apple learned from other companies who use hybrid outsourcing, yet does it quite well as a rule. It gives them more control of the process, but isn't the same as them making it themselves as you seem to be implying.
Regarding your question to me, it is totally irrelevant. I wasn't commenting about Apple's ability (or not) to make a car, nor was that ever my point in responding to your posts. You need to stop moving the goal posts and this isn't the first time you have done that. In another side conversation, you brought up the Apple Watch when the topic I was responding to was regarding differences of complexity in building a car versus a mobile phone.
To bring together both issues and posts of yours I commented on, Cars are very complex, if they weren't, Apple would be in the market already, there are many moving parts both literally and figuratively to bring something to market. If there wasn't Tesla wouldn't have so many recalls or poor customer satisfaction with regards to component failures up to this day. There would also be FAR more electric cars available as (like the SUV Boom) Manufacturers could charge a premium on the overall hype and popularity of such products that are less complex to build than an ICE powered car.
That said, in response to your question (that was never part of our previous conversation) I have faith that Apple can overcome these issues and build a proper automobile but It will take time. This isn't a modern replacement for an antiquated feature phone, this is a technological advancement in Transportation with many, many complex technical and legal obsticals attached.
Tesla owns the EV market and likely will for many years to come.
From what I can see, a lot of companies employ elder gentlemen who don’t think with a more modern mindset. That’s why most big companies react so slow to new more agile companies coming in and disrupting the market. By the time they react it’s too late.Why do these companies always do this? They underestimate Apple then just get humiliated when they end up being successful.