No, it's actually quite gloriously bad. Not really and musical, but lots of song and dance routines.
A musical about zombies has to be comedic.
No, it's actually quite gloriously bad. Not really and musical, but lots of song and dance routines.
Knightfall is a (very) long 90s run, expanding over three huge tradepaperbacks. Looks somewhat dated but I like it. Never collected Batman, or DC to be more precise, but the covers were awesome so that stuck and the whole buzz in general about it - so just got the collection a year ago.
You get the whole background story of Bane, his arrival in Gotham / set-up and final confrontation with Bats and Robin up to the famous break ya back scene. Bats retires and Azrael takes his place while pushing Robin aside.
Lots of good conflicts as well as general 'moral' questions about to what extent one can deal with evil while not crossing the line yourself as well as the steady corruption of or by power. Entertaining read plus Azrael had a kick-ass batman suit! Dated, but still. Good contrast to the classical bat-suit which wasn't the walking tank-suit it became in Nolan's movies.
Image
No, it's actually quite gloriously bad. Not really and musical, but lots of song and dance routines.
Watching The Big Sleep with my sister who wanted to see some classic B&W films.
Excellent choice. Tell her, she needs to see "Wuthering Heights" (1939). It is a true classic. I also highly recommend "Of Human Bondage" (1934) with Bette Davis and Leslie Howard. It followed the book by Somerset very closely and both actors give compelling performances.
Watching The Big Sleep with my sister who wanted to see some classic B&W films.
Maltese Falcon?
Casablanca?![]()
Thor - I think my cynical Frost Giant heart finally melted when I watched this again last night. Man, that bit with Odin casting the Frost Giants out of Earth was terrific. I like that they repeated this with Odin's father Bor in the sequel too. I could watch hours of that stuff probably as it screams the mythology to me.
Still not a Portman fan, but I won't shut the film off now.
I know this; I actually read the (very turgid) books a long time ago when I wanted to see what all of the fuss about Star Wars actually was about. However, to be perfectly honest, I don't think there is enough of narrative interest to justify nine books, let alone nine movies. The tales are extraordinarily threadbare, and badly written, hence the need to plump them up with special effects and bombast.
The original trilogy told the story that was interesting, and had epic undertones, along with a strong narrative arc, which was why the original movies concentrated on these, discreetly over-looking the fact that the story was told somewhat out of sequence.
Another single movie (and not three) - if properly done - could easily have told the story of Anakin's life's journey - the one leading to his moral collapse and physical transformation. (Godfather II charted the disintegration of Michael Corleone's moral universe exceptionally well).
My concern with this is that I seriously doubt that there is enough basic narrative material - in other words, enough story, and the best movies are stories which are well told, where props, and special effects, (and dare one say it, CGI) support the story, rather than the other way around, - to carry three movies.
Oh, they're on the list, and saved on the DVR.
Dude, that's excessive...
----------
I'm not a Clooney fan, he's always Mr. Clooney (calm, debonair, underplayed) in every role I've seen him do. "I'm off to die, you get home safe (wave)!"Maybe some of these other movies I've missed he has bared his soul.
In the colorful future, a cab driver unwittingly becomes the central figure in the search for a legendary cosmic weapon to keep Evil and Mr Zorg at bay.
Watching The Big Sleep with my sister who wanted to see some classic B&W films.
Excellent choice. Tell her, she needs to see "Wuthering Heights" (1939). It is a true classic. I also highly recommend "Of Human Bondage" (1934) with Bette Davis and Leslie Howard. It followed the book by Somerset very closely and both actors give compelling performances.
Maltese Falcon?
Casablanca?![]()
.
From the Star Wars thread:
I understand and agree with the validity of this critique as I see more and more cases of "milking it", (my repeat rant) movie makers taking a successful franchise and making the audience pay not once, not twice, but sometimes 3 times for what could have been told in a single or 2 part movie. Of course their excuse is, "but we are giving you more!" In the case of The Hobbit, they should have given us less, a lot less. Two movies at most.
For the Hobbit, if you look at significant events (Spoilers):
-Party
-Rivendell
-Orcs, escape from
-Beorn visit
-Mirkwood, spiders -----------I would have split this here with a spider cliff hanger.
-Woodland Faires and escape
-To the Mountain, Smaug
-Battle of 5 armies.
Keep in mind that the Battle of Five Armies is all most a footnote in the book.
Dr. Jekyll allows his dark side to run wild when he drinks a potion that turns him into the evil Mr. Hyde.
Talking of film franchises being milked for every last drop of cash, watched X-men days of future past.
The story had a number of holes. For example, how come Professor X is alive in the future, when he was killed by Gene?
Given what Wolverine knew of Striker, why didn't he kill him in the past?
Simple-> To maintain sanity, don't apply logic. Just a general statement regarding time travel paradoxes.If you want to hear something really sad, I watched it and barely remember any of the details, other than Dr. Trask and the Sentinels. I seem to recall an XMen comic episode where time travel was involved, might have even involved Sentinels.