Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
On the Arthurian theme, I have a soft spot for King Arthur (2004) with Clive Owen et al.
Not too improbable as an explanation of a supposed historical Arthur.

Though why that noble Roman family were farming miles beyond Hadrian's Wall I never understood.

Best battle on ice scene since Aleksandr Nevsky. :)
[doublepost=1503589698][/doublepost]

And who could forget the immortal… Swept Away.
Best thing to do would be to sweep that under the carpet!


Well I guess this time they will spell it out that Deckard is indeed a replicant. Which would be a pity. Somethings are always nice to just speculate over and not have a confirmed answer.
Dreamy unicorn dreams FTW. :)

I actually like that version of King Arthur also. I found it quite entertaining.

That is one thing I loved about Blade Runner, we were left to wonder and speculate about Deckard. We were not force feed what he was. It was left up to the viewer to draw their own conclusion on him.

I found that little snippet pretty interesting.......... And yes, I think we are going to find out the real truth about him in this one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Queen6 and Huntn
That is one thing I loved about Blade Runner, we were left to wonder and speculate about Deckard. We were not force feed what he was. It was left up to the viewer to draw their own conclusion on him.

I found that little snippet pretty interesting.......... And yes, I think we are going to find out the real truth about him in this one.

Which is probably why, the new one wont make it into my 'universe'. (My general rule of thumb these days is to avoid remakes and sequels of 70s and 80s movies).
 
Which is probably why, the new one wont make it into my 'universe'. (My general rule of thumb these days is to avoid remakes and sequels of 70s and 80s movies).

I tend to agree since the majority of remakes/sequels have been bad. Fright Night and Total Recall come to mind right off the bat.

But I do have hopes for this one since it looks to be carrying a lot of the visual aspects that I really liked from the first movie, but again, I am optimistic about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
That is one thing I loved about Blade Runner, we were left to wonder and speculate about Deckard. We were not force feed what he was. It was left up to the viewer to draw their own conclusion on him.

from a movie fanatic to another. some viewers want to know more about a persona in a movie to understand him or the movie better. your comment reminds me of the awful movie called 'Cube' (1997) at the end it leaves you high and dry, no explanation about nothing...

FYI: i think Cube was the inspiration for the movie 'Saw'
 
from a movie fanatic to another. some viewers want to know more about a persona in a movie to understand him or the movie better. your comment reminds me of the awful movie called 'Cube' (1997) at the end it leaves you high and dry, no explanation about nothing...

FYI: i think Cube was the inspiration for the movie 'Saw'

I completely understand that. Just like there was some commotion regarding the ending of "Inception" with the spinning top........

The Cube, never heard of it........... Good? I liked the original 'Saw' a lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
And the movie I would love to watch tonight - but, alas, I don't have it here with me, it is elsewhere, taking the form of a DVD at home - is Grand Hotel Budapest; that elegiac, bitter-sweet note of hilarity and heart-break with a knowing nod to the agony and farcical horror of history is just what I am in the mood for.

And, what a cast, what a script, what a lovely multi-layered narrative, what sublime pictorial composition, what a subtle awareness of history, and what a stunning soundtrack. Wonderful.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
And the movie I would love to watch tonight - but, alas, I don't it here with me, it is elsewhere, taking the form of a DVD at home - is Grand Hotel Budapest; that elegiac, bitter-sweet note of hilarity and heart-break with a knowing nod to the agony and farcical horror of history is just what I am in the mood for.

And, what a cast, what a script, what a lovely multi-layered narrative, what sublime pictorial composition, what a subtle awareness of history, and what a stunning soundtrack. Wonderful.
Just download it from iTunes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
My turning point was Superman Returns.... damn near ruined the franchise for me. Had to suppress the memory of it, and to rewatch the Christoper Reeve movies to remind myself what I liked about SuperMan movies. (Although, I'm not sure anyone can replace/surpass Chris Reeve as Superman in my mind).

Since that experience i've become highly skeptical of movies which try and bait me with nostalgia/sentimentality for franchises(Superman, Die Hard, Indiana Jones, Star Wars, Terminator, Blade Runner, Alien, Conan, etc).

Maybe its me getting older?

Tangent: Isn't it strange/coincidental that so many of those great *ORIGINAL* movies came out in the 1975-1985 era?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
rented this movie on VUDU. it had alot of potential but fell flat, Prometheis is still better. there were alot of deatils that made the movie lame. like for example: when they went to that "safehaven" with the other android that didnt have 1 door to protect them, lol. they focused too much on the android guy and how can a robot have feelings and start kissing people. and how did the last Xeno get on the plane? i like the Alien franchise but they keep messing it up.


 
ingrid-west-banner.jpg


3/4 stars. Aubrey Plaza is amazing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pachyderm
Gattaca (1997)- This movie was recently mentioned in the How Technology Changes Us thread in this forum so I decided to partake. A watchable movie, one that amply illustrates a world where designer babies are the norm, and natural babies if they have any genetic issues are relegated to being janitors. It's makes a good, believable point. :)

gattaca1.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Queen6 and arkitect
MV5BMjI5Njk0NTIyNV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNjU4MjY5MDI@._V1_UX182_CR0,0,182,268_AL_.jpg

Underworld: whatever the hell the next one is called. I really liked the first few, but this one felt like "Uh, oh Bekinsale's getting older, and needs cash, let's do another one. Don't worry, no one cares if it even makes sense."
 
Well, the version of Excalibur that I am discussing dates from the 80s; John Boorman directed it, and the wonderful Helen Mirren (just read the the names of some of the cast......Nicol Williamson, Helen Mirren, Liam Neeson, Patrick Stewart, Nigel Terry......) had a major role.

Agree that Cate Blanchett is an excellent actress.
I remember being taken to this at the age of eight or so. Went with my friend Jordan, chaperoned by a close friend of his father's. I remember just a few things: this friend had an 8-track player in his car. I'd never heard of it but it seemed cool. Also, during the movie, there was a part where a crow was pecking out a corpse's eye. There was also a nubile bare breast. I think my first exposure. I think those two elements were in nearly adjacent scenes because that's when this chaperone pulled us from our seats and we went for ice cream or something. First time I'd left a theater before the movie was over.

For whatever reason, I've never revisited it beyond the aforementioned "Carmina Burana" trailer.

As to my own viewing, tonight I'm having a few people over. We're going to watch Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol. 2 (in UHD or 3D, we'll see). I haven't seen it but it sounds like the kind of candy-coated escapism that this week has handily earned. One can't live on pretentious films alone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
One can't live on pretentious films alone.

Actually, @IronWaffle, you can. Trust me, you can.

Unlike most here, I actually don't enjoy watching movies.

Therefore, the movie needs to be exceptionally good - in basic intelligence, story-telling, cast, soundtrack, cinematography, - to justify my even watching it. It would be nice, too, if women were not merely portrayed as moronic eye candy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
Actually, @IronWaffle, you can. Trust me, you can.

Unlike most here, I actually don't enjoy watching movies.

Therefore, the movie needs to be exceptionally good - in basic intelligence, story-telling, cast, soundtrack, cinematography, - to justify my even watching it. It would be nice, too, if women were not merely portrayed as moronic eye candy.

It was a reference to my own normal consumption.

Coming up in my queue: Kor-Eda's latest (After the Storm). I count two of his prior films, After-Life and the love letter to Ozu, Still Walking among my absolute favorites by any contemporary director. It's also time for my annual revisit of Kieslowski's Three Colors Trilogy. I'd re-watch his seminal Dekalog but I have yet to pick up the upgrade. I also recently splurged on the British film 45 Years. Staid and all the more heartbreaking for it, I'm not ready to rewatch it but I'm excited to listen to the commentary, on which the director apparently discusses many of his cinematic choices and his approach to adapting the source material. Among other recent indulgences is Chantal Akerman's Jeanne Dielman, 23, quai du commerce, 1080 Bruxelles but I'm saving that to watch with one of two friends who also appreciates such contemplative and understated works.

I'm also planning a double feature of the Dardennes' Kid with a Bike, which was the film which five years ago reinvigorated my love of cinema. I'm planning to pair it with the Korean film Poetry which, while quite different in most aspects, is likewise observational and more drama than melodrama but which does have a few similar elements I've wanted to contemplate but couldn't since Poetry had been inaccessible. I recently found it very inexpensively so I finally get to indulge. Then there are a few Bressons. I just acquired his last film, L'Argent on DVD. I've yet to see it at all, but it's deeply intriguing to me and it's the only place to hear the commentary. That I'll have to do alone. I've yet to meet in person anyone who can sit through his grim films such as Mouchette and Au Hasard Balthasar (probably my favorite of his)... except A Man Apart since, though it is French it has very little dialogue, and, though it is "slow", it is ostensibly a "prison escape" film that can maintain the attention of even those uninterested in political subtext.

There are more, but like that never-ending unfinished stack of books and albums, I can't seem to find the time... and with turbulent news so frequently in my mind... the mindspace for arthouse. It's probably been a month or so since I've even tried. Tonight, Guardians will be nice because I really need to escape the seriousness and it was an easy way to get a few people over.



Edited to add...
Re: women as moronic eye candy... that's deeply frustrating. My understanding is it's not so bad in this movie; certainly easier than when I sometimes reach for some classic Star Trek original series episodes. Those are painful. I can't abide most popcorn flicks. I utterly despise Michael Bay on too many principles to go into. I absolutely didn't mean "eye candy" in terms of women. Specifically in production design, sound design, overall execution, etc.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe
Gattaca (1997)- This movie was recently mentioned in the How Technology Changes Us thread in this forum so I decided to partake. A watchable movie, one that amply illustrates a world where designer babies are the norm, and natural babies if they have any genetic issues are relegated to being janitors. It's makes a good, believable point. :)

gattaca1.jpg
Oooooh! :)
I love this film — always tear up at the end… just a fab experience all in all.
Beautiful styling, Michael Nyman soundtrack, Uma Thurman, Ethan Hawke, Jude Law and Gore Vidal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huntn
Watched this yesterday....

220px-A_Dog%27s_Purpose_%28film%29.jpg


... mixed emotions abt it. Generally enjoyed it, but a few things i didnt like.
 
Sadly we have to wait in the UK until Monday :(
Did you hear What Happened?? :p
[doublepost=1503935078][/doublepost]
ingrid-west-banner.jpg


3/4 stars. Aubrey Plaza is amazing.
Based on her performance in Legion, she seems to have a bright professional future.
[doublepost=1503935819][/doublepost]
rented this movie on VUDU. it had alot of potential but fell flat, Prometheis is still better. there were alot of deatils that made the movie lame. like for example: when they went to that "safehaven" with the other android that didnt have 1 door to protect them, lol. they focused too much on the android guy and how can a robot have feelings and start kissing people. and how did the last Xeno get on the plane? i like the Alien franchise but they keep messing it up.


I think David was attempting to emulate his own version of humanity.

As everyone knows ;), I was very unhappy with this movie. Prometheus although it had flaws was a much better story which included and laid the groundwork for huge reveals for Alien cannon.

While Covenant was the way the director decided to take the story, when he had complete artistic control, why choose such a depressing, unworthy narrative? So bad, I experienced a flashback to Alien 3. :p
 
Did you hear What Happened?? :p
[doublepost=1503935078][/doublepost]
Based on her performance in Legion, she seems to have a bright professional future.
[doublepost=1503935819][/doublepost]
I think David was attempting to emulate his own version of humanity.

As everyone knows ;), I was very unhappy with this movie. Prometheus although it had flaws was a much better story which included and laid the groundwork for huge reveals for Alien cannon.

While Covenant was the way the director decided to take the story, when he had complete artistic control, why choose such a depressing, unworthy narrative? So bad, I experienced a flashback to Alien 3. :p
All caught up now thanks!
 
MV5BMjE4MDQxMDg3MF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNjQ0MTcwMzI@._V1_UX182_CR0,0,182,268_AL_.jpg

What Happened to Monday. Stellar cast in a dystopian future. Gratuitous sex and violence. I thought it was just a little flat, but still very engaging.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.