Lot of typing there... my point remains: who knows? It could be a complex situation, or something as simple as 'they didn't consider it yet'. Just because an option that you may want doesn't exist (yet) doesn't mean Apple is secretly trying to kill you or your dog. The Watch has been available for about 5 months now. That's it. Comparing its customization offerings to those of a multi-year product is silly at this point. I'm contemplating developing for the Watch, and am running OS 2 - this will be its FIRST stable, usable software release (arguably). The Watch has a few areas it needs to improve upon for any hope of fulfilling all of Apple's lofty goals - and a damn Kermit face isn't one of them. The fact is that collaborations like this Hermès one will attract more customers to the product line. Apple could very well be working on a way to allow personal photos as background images with other faces - which is more difficult than it would appear, with issues concerning visibility, contrast, usability, etc. (Graphics needing to change based on the colors of a custom photo, especially... there's a lot more entailed than just putting a picture behind any face you may want.) Regardless of how many times you say it, there's a reason why Apple's chosen (so far) to only allow custom images with a standard, complication-less, digital face.Well for starters the Watch OS 2 is probably going to allow the user to set a maximum duration of 70 seconds, which means those screens are going to get a lot more eyeball time. And obviously Apple is not going to allow unvetted watch faces to be sold in their stores, which I hope is the biggest stumbling block for Apple to allow developers to start selling custom faces, and the reason we haven't seen it yet. But there is no reason they should be restricting the user from creating their own watch face, if only placing a photo behind any of the current 6 generic options (just like I can make a custom ringtone for my iPhone out of any music I own), which begs the question what's the real reason behind Apple's sluggish rollout on offering them? Why won't they let me have a picture of my dog with just clock hands centered on her nose? It would make me smile every time I saw it. And there's absolutely no technical reason for them not to allow that.
The Watch debuted with 10 watch faces, 4 of them variations on the same simple analogue design. And now they're adding just two more variations on the simple digital clock? Compare that to the iPod Nano watch faces, which ended its run with 18 notably distinct watch faces, including Minnie Mouse, Kermit the frog and Animal. By all accounts Apple was controlling the options, though it's hard to say for sure since by the time they released the 1.2 update with all those faces, Apple was most likely already talking about doing the Watch. Who knows maybe they would have added the ability to import custom watch faces, if they hand't decided to go into the watch business. But the fact they recognized just 4 years ago the impact of choice over the watch faces for customers that they released 18 of them, along with 4 trademarked and licensed options, suggests there's another agenda here other than technological limitations of 1.0 software.
Back to the thread... wife's definitely getting the Hermès double tour, unless she can somehow just get the band. (I told her the lugs won't match with her Space Black case; she says that's not a big deal. I say it's grounds for divorce.)