Looks nice. Can we see a pic of the front of the watch with the Hermes watch face?
Don't like that look at all.Even though I couldn't get a cuff version, I was able to try it on.
I thought it would be wider and bigger. I have very thin wrists, so I was curious if I would be able to wear it with a dress shirt. I think it is certainly doable. But definitely not with slim shirts.![]()
![]()
I agree. I don't think the cuff compliments the lines of the watch very well at all.Don't like that look at all.
That watch face! Love it.
Complications are one of the main reasons I love my Apple Watch so much. This watch face removed that feature all together. Not sure that I understand this watch face. I guess it's mainly just for fashion, but why would you get a smart watch just purely for fashion?
I generally agree, but it's a beautiful face - and the same information gleaned from complications can be a swipe or two away with Glances. Doesn't "dumb" down the smarts of the watch at all, really.Complications are one of the main reasons I love my Apple Watch so much. This watch face removed that feature all together. Not sure that I understand this watch face. I guess it's mainly just for fashion, but why would you get a smart watch just purely for fashion?
You still get notifications, apps, etc. You can also switch to any of the other watch faces.Complications are one of the main reasons I love my Apple Watch so much. This watch face removed that feature all together. Not sure that I understand this watch face. I guess it's mainly just for fashion, but why would you get a smart watch just purely for fashion?
Complications are one of the main reasons I love my Apple Watch so much. This watch face removed that feature all together. Not sure that I understand this watch face. I guess it's mainly just for fashion, but why would you get a smart watch just purely for fashion?
Complications are one of the main reasons I love my Apple Watch so much. This watch face removed that feature all together. Not sure that I understand this watch face. I guess it's mainly just for fashion, but why would you get a smart watch just purely for fashion?
It hasn't proven to be a can of worms with Apple's stock bands, which are also covered under the standard warranty and AC+.
Yeah just don't know why people are falling over the face. I love the single tour band, but the watch face is nothing to write home about.Really no different from some of Apple's stock digital faces that do not allow for complications, and Hermes AW owners aren't obligated to use the Hermes face.
Yeah just don't know why people are falling over the face. I love the single tour band, but the watch face is nothing to write home about.
Yeah it's fine, just nothing special.I think people like it, because it uses more of the edges of the OLED screen, rather than a small circle in the center, like the other analog looking watch faces. I wouldn't mind one squared off, analog looking complication as an option, whether it says Hermes or not, but it isn't too big of a deal, to me.
Yeah it's fine, just nothing special.
Yeah just don't know why people are falling over the face. I love the single tour band, but the watch face is nothing to write home about.
Well the part of your post about it being the most elegant is solely your opinion. I love some of the stock ones, and plenty of people give me compliments about it. I am not saying the Hermes is ugly, but it's not the greatest thing Apple has done with the Apple Watch. I think the leather Hermes bands are 100 times better and look amazing.It's actually the most elegant face available on the AW. Apple's stock analog faces are poorly proportioned, as manufacturers of luxury rectangular watches tend to use a rectangular dial that follows the perimeter. I'd actually like to see Apple release more elegant stock faces with a rectangular dial and the complications located inside the dial.
However, the Hermes face isn't the only reason nor it's even a reason for getting a Hermes AW.