That looks like fake news bro 😀
Why is it not real?
Seems plausible to me. Face id uses a camera, illuminator and sensor. Touch id is just one sensor. Just to power up the camera takes many times more energy.
That looks like fake news bro 😀
Why is it not real?
Seems plausible to me. Face id uses a camera, illuminator and sensor. Touch id is just one sensor. Just to power up the camera takes many times more energy.
A Google translation of a random Russian website does not a strong source make.
Not if I’m blind!I don't understand how people are categorizing "look at your phone" as an extra step. You have to look at the phone anyway to use it...
Not trying to make a drawn out post.
Think of TouchID as if there was nothing to touch. Pretend like TouchID simply knows you when you pick up the phone.
That's it. You simply pick up the phone. This is a one step process.
Now FaceID. You have to pick up your phone, look at your phone, and swipe up. Three steps.
The reason why I ask you to forget that you are actually touching the TouchID button is because after a while of using the phone, the physical interaction of touching the button is integrated into the process of simply picking the phone up.
This is an analysis of physical interaction between the two technologies. One requires you to simply hold your phone while the other is a three step process which includes picking it up, physically placing it in front of your face, and then using your hand to gesture for unlock.
If we use the principle that any technology can improve by simplifying it's process, we can see that TouchID is actually the superior technology.
Strictly objective.
No. In interviews, they have already said that the future for iOS devices involves Face ID and not Touch ID.I have a strong feeling Touch ID will come back to the iPhone when they figure out putting it under the display. And especially since it seems Samsung is dedicated to doing the same.
Not better or worse. Just different.
I have a strong feeling Touch ID will come back to the iPhone when they figure out putting it under the display. And especially since it seems Samsung is dedicated to doing the same.
Unless you can come up with a good reason to it won’t. And I haven’t seen one good reason to yet, after using Face ID for a few days...
You are simply wrong, objectively.
I have to physically not only touch my phone but I have to touch it in a certain way to get Touch ID to work. And then I have to hope it works... and more importantly, you clearly aren’t even contemplating about when you are using Touch ID to access a password inside an actual app. Face ID is so much faster and easier than Touch ID ever was for that, it’s ridiculous.
Don’t get me wrong, I am surprised how much of a difference it made for me, and how I already can’t understand why Touch ID was worth my time by comparison. And if you ever get to use Face ID on your own phone, you will feel the same.
And you can’t think of Touch as something you don’t have to touch. Right there you lose the ability to call your argument objective, because you are saying you need to ignore what you have to actually do to use it.
By the way, when was the last time you wanted to use your phone, and used Touch ID to unlock it, but didn’t want to actually look at your phone or have it face you? Seriously, I want to know when and why because I can’t think of one time I ever have. If I’m unlocking my phone I’m looking at the dang thing because I want something from it in the first place!
Not everyone will feel the same as you. And it's not like Apple hasn't been working on it already. Apple actually wanted to keep Touch ID.
Not everyone will feel the same as you. And it's not like Apple hasn't been working on it already. Apple actually wanted to keep Touch ID.
No, you are clearly wrong objectively speaking....
With touch ID you get in way faster without sliding up or having to hold the phone at a certain angle or at a certain distance from your face.
Im not into taking 100 duckface selfies a day to get into my phone, maybe it would be a great practice for teenage girls though 😀
Objectively, it depends.Not trying to make a drawn out post.
Think of TouchID as if there was nothing to touch. Pretend like TouchID simply knows you when you pick up the phone.
That's it. You simply pick up the phone. This is a one step process.
Now FaceID. You have to pick up your phone, look at your phone, and swipe up. Three steps.
The reason why I ask you to forget that you are actually touching the TouchID button is because after a while of using the phone, the physical interaction of touching the button is integrated into the process of simply picking the phone up.
This is an analysis of physical interaction between the two technologies. One requires you to simply hold your phone while the other is a three step process which includes picking it up, physically placing it in front of your face, and then using your hand to gesture for unlock.
If we use the principle that any technology can improve by simplifying it's process, we can see that TouchID is actually the superior technology.
Strictly objective.
That will be the day I say goodbye to Apple. Damn iPhone can't make or accept a hands free call in my Car Play equipped car without connecting to the USB port.In many ways that may be true, but it also adds functionality that wasn’t possible with Touch ID. While it’s still in its infancy when developers get ahold of it and unlock all the potential they can dream up its the game changer we all know it can be.
Also this paved the way for a port free and button free IPhone trust me it’s coming in a few years when they get wireless charging fast enough the ports are a goner
I have not altered how close I hold my phone to my face or the angle, or anything else of that nature to get Face ID to work. In fact I can pick it up more naturally now instead of having to fiddle with making sure my thumb is in the right spot!. So that’s out the window. The slide up is no different than what I had before, I want to see notifications first. I expect at some point that may change as well, with a toggle anyway. As others have said, you can just swipe up as it unlocks which takes just as much effort as putting the your finger in the Touch ID sensor so that is not a good argument either.
And do you use last pass? Apple Pay? Or any kind of password keeper? How about banking apps? Hotel apps? Any kind of app that allows you to log in with your Touch ID? All are much faster with Face ID than Touch ID. My last pass is instant, where as before it had to think for a moment. It’s not even close.
To try and complain about Face ID in one instance only when it is the same speed and forget all the other ways it’s down right faster and easier is missing the bigger picture.
When I'm plugged into the USB port of my car and in order to use Car Play the phone initially has to be unlocked, which is a royal pain with Face ID, as I have the phone connected to a Pro Clip holder.You are simply wrong, objectively.
I have to physically not only touch my phone but I have to touch it in a certain way to get Touch ID to work. And then I have to hope it works... and more importantly, you clearly aren’t even contemplating about when you are using Touch ID to access a password inside an actual app. Face ID is so much faster and easier than Touch ID ever was for that, it’s ridiculous.
Don’t get me wrong, I am surprised how much of a difference it made for me, and how I already can’t understand why Touch ID was worth my time by comparison. And if you ever get to use Face ID on your own phone, you will feel the same.
And you can’t think of Touch as something you don’t have to touch. Right there you lose the ability to call your argument objective, because you are saying you need to ignore what you have to actually do to use it.
By the way, when was the last time you wanted to use your phone, and used Touch ID to unlock it, but didn’t want to actually look at your phone or have it face you? Seriously, I want to know when and why because I can’t think of one time I ever have. If I’m unlocking my phone I’m looking at the dang thing because I want something from it in the first place!
TouchID is superior in terms of faster(for now) and requires less steps to unlocked your phone. I love the Touch ID, but I think if this move is really from a security stand point, then might be pointless to included both, since we most likely will pick the one thats faster or more familiar.Not trying to make a drawn out post.
Think of TouchID as if there was nothing to touch. Pretend like TouchID simply knows you when you pick up the phone.
That's it. You simply pick up the phone. This is a one step process.
Now FaceID. You have to pick up your phone, look at your phone, and swipe up. Three steps.
The reason why I ask you to forget that you are actually touching the TouchID button is because after a while of using the phone, the physical interaction of touching the button is integrated into the process of simply picking the phone up.
This is an analysis of physical interaction between the two technologies. One requires you to simply hold your phone while the other is a three step process which includes picking it up, physically placing it in front of your face, and then using your hand to gesture for unlock.
If we use the principle that any technology can improve by simplifying it's process, we can see that TouchID is actually the superior technology.
Strictly objective.
Everyone’s use case is different but for me, this is important. Well said.something which many people don't do when trying to be discrete.
When I'm plugged into the USB port of my car and in order to use Car Play the phone initially has to be unlocked, which is a royal pain with Face ID, as I have the phone connected to a Pro Clip holder.
You dont even have to look where to put your thumb because the indentation is there for you on the bottom of the phone and it reads your print entered on all orientations 😀 Unlike FaceID.
Many people having issues with FaceID not working as it should and have to hold it at certain distance and angle, never had to deal with any of that with TouchID.
This seems like a steps backwards to me.