Just lbro, just chrmjenkins, just iBlue...
Sorry, I'm not Chamberlain, I'm not following a policy of appeasement.
Forget iBlue, forget stonyc...
give me chrjenkins and we go from there...
Just lbro, just chrmjenkins, just iBlue...
Sorry, I'm not Chamberlain, I'm not following a policy of appeasement.
Ok, so let's all look together at where we currently stand.
Jav's prayer confirmed for us that we have a vamp/ww among the following list of players:
1: iBookG4user
2: stonyc (killed by WW's)
3: philbeeney
4: appleguy123 - self admitted goth (lynched)
5: Don't panic
6: Nathanmuir - self admitted undertaker
7: iBlue (lynched)
If we are to believe Nathanmuir and I haven't yet heard a good reason not to believe him, then we know either philbeeney, Don't panic, or iBookG4user are a bad guy. None of them have yet to reveal a role or provide any defense beyond, "I'm not a bad guy."
As for voting:
philbeeney: 1 (Cboss)
Don't panic: 2 (Rodimus Prime,iBookG4user)
NathanMuir: 2 (philbeeney, jav6454)
jav6454: 1 (NathanMuir)
Mexbearpig: 1 (Don't panic)
left to vote (mscriv,Mexbearpig)
Jav who I'm not sure is still safe or not (when did the protection end?) is voting for Nathanmuir in some kind of effort to force him to reveal other information. Philbeeney is joining him in this effort. To me these both seem like wasted votes. In turn Nathan is voting for Jav in retaliation under the hopes that jav has been infected. This also seems like a wasted vote. I agee mexbearpig has been quiet and I do find it odd that he is pushing Nathan to tell him if he has scanned a goth, but Don't panic, this also seems like an ill-advised vote to me.
I can sort of give philbeeney and Don't panic a pass in that they are trying to get peple to vote for others as opposed to voting for them, but why are we not working together to focus on the obvious list of suspects we have. Based on what we know and what seems credible from Nathanmuir (undertaker) then we know for sure there is a bad guy among iBookG4user, philbeeney, and Don't panic. Can we all agree that we should be focusing on one of these three?
I'm just afraid a lot of arguing and posturing is distracting us from working together. This is where we really need the NW's help, but I understand that they can not reveal themselves for fear of infection. However, you can vote together or at least strategize together so we don't waste this vote.
Think about it everyone, there are only 9 of us left and from what we know there's 2 WWs, a vamp, and a goth stil out there. Throw the infection in the mix and numbers are 5 baddies to 4 good guys. Things don't look good.![]()
Let's make this vote count.
We can make it count if Nathan says what chrmjenkins was. That's all I need.
We can make it count if Nathan says what chrmjenkins was. That's all I need.
Look jav, you're not exactly proving to be trustworthy at this point. You've led the charge against an innocent and you're claiming to know how to solve the puzzle without sharing with any of us the puzzle pieces you claim to know. Instead of just pushing Nathan to give up the info, how about you explain why that one piece of information is so important?
It might also go a long way toward proving trust if you withdraw your vote for him or possibly move it to one of the potential big three: iBook, phil, or Don't.
I am still wondering why you are so dead set on chrmjenkin?
Deadline in 3 hours I think assuming CST
2 hours. ravenvii's post was 12:30am EST on Monday morning. Actually 1 hour and 40 minutes from this post.
I expect a flurry of posts to commence shortly before the deadline arrives.
Doesn't the post say 12:30 on Wednesday? Meaning we have another whole day?
Unless we stitched to the 48 hour day.
Wow, you're pretty switched on for a newbie especially as you are correct. Seems Rodimus and myself have lost a complete day somewhere. Damn you Daylight Savings.![]()
Look jav, you're not exactly proving to be trustworthy at this point. You've led the charge against an innocent and you're claiming to know how to solve the puzzle without sharing with any of us the puzzle pieces you claim to know. Instead of just pushing Nathan to give up the info, how about you explain why that one piece of information is so important?
It might also go a long way toward proving trust if you withdraw your vote for him or possibly move it to one of the potential big three: iBook, phil, or Don't.
Out of the Test, into this debate. Basically, the pieces of the puzzle I have can't be shown right now; not without affecting me (ie me killed by wolves). It would more advantageous for the wolves to know what is still not out there, than know what chrmjenkins was. The wolves can only hide with what they know is killed but unknown to us... which they will guess since we know since stonyc and iBlue's roles are still in the air; they can pretty much guess those two. If they try to pull a fast one, Nathan will know about it ASAP. However, knowing chrmjenkins role will most likely lead me to believe in Nathan 100% (versus 60%) and take his word without question for the time being.
That is why I know that if know chrmjenkins role the wolves won't have any upper hand still. Posted from iPhone
You were/ are the priest. You are not privy to any private information. If you've been recruited into the NW you still wouldn't be privy to any private information, except you would know the idenities of three good guys. However, given the number of people still alive, you wouldn't be able to effectively narrow down the list of possible wolves/ vamps.
This just makes me more sure of the fact that you've been infected.
Posted from my iPhone.
You see, there are certain things I am able to do without having to privy. Just like reasoning out who you've scanned to find your targets is one. Using standard probability theorems and Gaussian distributions and other things along the lines is another.
I happen to have used the second one for this. So, if you please, Mr "undertaker", the role?
Sorry, your track record isn't that great when it comes to figuring out the baddies.
I still think you're infected thus I'm still not going to give away that information for no good reason.
Posted from my iPhone.