Implying that he is just an innocent villager (he might be)
Again, implying that he is just a innocent villager.
Well, my question is. What am I supposed to say when I'm accused like that? I can't say something random or that rises suspicion. I have to look at the acusation and confront it head on. Hence the "I am villager" response.
Saying he wishes he could be one of the ww/vamps.
Don't we all?
Again, implying that he is a innocent villager
Again, he says he is just a innocent villager.
See above.
Those posts have sarcasm imprinted on them over twice my usual liking. If you can't pick that up, then I would see why of your choice. But trust me, smiley faces and strong sarcasm riddle those two posts.
I didn't want Don't Panic to bold your name, I just interpreted his post as a vote and thought he maybe forgot to bold it.
But why (if you figured he forgot to bold) would you need to remind so adamantly? Wouldn't he eventually realize it and do it?
If jav6454 would have implied that he was an innocent villager only once I wouldn't have become suspicious but he implied it several times which made me suspicious.
Why, if I am a werewolf, would I want to have jav6454 lynched so badly? He hasn't said anything before that would make anyone think that I am the werewolf.
If I were to have said or implied that I am a villager only once, I think it would mean I would have give up on the game since Day 1.
So now you are saying.
Why, if I am a werewolf, would I want to have jav6454 lynched so badly? He hasn't said anything before that would make anyone think that I am the werewolf.
Then why do you want me lynched? If I have given you no evidence of mut-like actions, why would you want me gone? I'm curious, do you wish the wolves to have more power over us?
ok, here is my thought:
the wolves have a powerful voting claque (3, maybe 4 coordinated votes), so they can easily try to 'drive' the decision, although not too much in an overt way as not to rise too many eyebrows.
they probably would just let te paesants decide who to fry, unless one of them is in danger. then you shoud expect them to intervene to save their brethren.
initially i was suspicious of Jav and abijnk, based on various post and particularly because or their leading the charge on iBlue, when she looked quite clearly innocent.
if one of them was accused, with some traction, some of the other ww should have come to the rescue and divert the attention, and the votes, to someone else.
enter Jav6545, the accused, and abijnk, the defender .
they diverted the tide from jav, eventually to willbro, not without some merit in their arguments.
except, where is willbro's kin if he is a wolf? nowhere to be seen.
i therefore submit that Jav6454 should be the sacrificed one, and if he is a wolf we move on to abjnk. if on the other hand he is a normal villager, then sorry-buddy-I-knew-all-along-you-were-innocent, and next time it's willbro's turn.
abijnk didn't vote or at least hasn't voted for
willbro. In fact her vote is still casted at
ufcgrad93. I don't see how that is helping me.
Also, she hasn't said a beep since yesterday and if you read correctly I have been the one actively defending myself.
abijnk just gave a view point, but an idea that people already share, nothing new. It would be picked up right away as you said, but I don't see
abijnk here shouting at her lungs tops,
we are not WW!!!. Instead, she just posted, that
willbro and me are at a desperate streak. If she was my ally, wouldn't she have just changed her vote by now?
As per the
iBlue case, didn't we all agree it was the mod mentality that took over? Diverting attention would be too obvious of a sham.