Have you used many laptops in the last 10 years? They're mostly trash. By year 3, they are starting to seriously show their age both physically and in performance.
The whining about the keyboard, which is easily replaceable, and the over blown flex gate issue is about all that's come out of Apple in the last few years regarding their laptops.
Just a few in the last 30 years on engineering projects globally, equally all high tier systems. MBP keyboard is a joke and a refection of Apple's general lack of investment in the Mac. I've never seen so many professional's dump the Mac as it has become more and more a stylised lifestyle product not a professional tool. Those that rely on their hardware for a living have little tolerance for such nonsense.
I tend to be $2.5K upwards for a notebook regardless of OS, switching hardware to suit the project. A full loaded Portable Workstation will run you around $15K. Sorry MacBook's don't make the cut professionally now, being underpowered, port constrained, lacking usability, worst of all unreliable - 3 years in and the Butterfly keyboard still remains to be a problem solely due to Apple's hubris. Anyone thinking different is sadly misled. Multinational corporations do not put extended warranty plans in place costing millions USD due to a few failed units, they do to protect themselves from legal action that will potentially be far more punitive, Apple has a long history of this with the MBP...
There's a reason why so few professional's use the Mac these days and Apple is actively driving the few of us who still do away, barring those locked into IOS development. What amuses me is Apple is so clearly desperate to associate the MBP with professional's levering the "Halo" effect to the full, in order to make it's base customer's feel better about Apple's expensive computing line up.
Apple has an opportunity with the upcoming 9th Gen Intel CPU's to redeem itself in many professional communities or it can do the same again and present another "pig with lipstick". Right now Apple is just becoming a laughingstock in many communities where it was once thought so highly of...
FWIW I've over two decades with the Mac, others far more

Pro my arse
Q-6
[doublepost=1551170614][/doublepost]
Your definition of “easily replaceable” is quite interesting. By this measure every problem plaguing the current MBP lineup (you missed some, like SSDs and screen coating) can be classified as ‘easy’ because it requires replacement of half of the computer.
I'd like to see this "easy" replaceable MBP keyboard done on YouTube, as even the Apple Store's struggle to do it in a timely manner. Likely the design of the Butterfly was to reduce chassis height and save Apple production cost, only it has massively backfired as Apple was too cheap to fully qualify the keyboard.
SSD's on the main board effectively kills the MBP for any professional use where NDA is enforce as one is compelled to scrap the unit. If anyone can decrypt the drives, it will be the originator, clients are not interested in why's or wherefores they expect security of the data, and adherence to contract...
Q-6
[doublepost=1551171506][/doublepost]
@SDColorado.. do you want to whip out your two dells from early 2000s?

My oldest working computer is from 2K and that's an old Hewlett-Packard, found it last year in one of the outhouses at our farm in a plastic bag. Plugged it in and it booted up, not bad for something abandoned years ago.
Oldest I have with me locally are again is a HP DV2 circa 2008 and an Early 2008 15" MBP. IMHO the great longevity of Mac's is mostly Smoke & Mirrors. Yes $400 notebooks don't last, match dollar for dollar and PC OEM notebooks easily stand up to the test of time.
Q-6
[doublepost=1551172309][/doublepost]
I found the first person on the planet that thinks Microsoft restores as well as Apple. Too funny.
More a statement of your lack of knowledge, nothing else. I can restore my primary workstation in a matter of minutes, I simply use the tools that Microsoft provides, I can do the same with a Mac, although I need to use a 3rd party solution to be as effective.
W10 is far more stable than macOS currently is and is getting better as time progresses. I don't care for the aesthetic, equally the OS does not interfere with my workflow and that's what counts. All your doing is illustrating your lack of knowledge with people who use both platforms professionally.
Both W10 & macOS have positives and negatives, that equally benefit and conflict with users workflow, however if one is willing to learn the best can be levered from both operating systems. If macOS was superior for my needs I'd be replying on it, as to why ask Apple...
Q-6