Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It is sometimes annoying, but Apple just slowly moves playing the long game, not chasing some short term glory offering some numbers in a spec sheet. HomePod will be huge, i can see where Apple is moving with this.

Homepod is A.I. What place is Apple in? A.I. improves immensely with user data collection. What is Apple's 'long game' on that one?
 
Where did they find the audience? Sounded like a Tim Cook fan club. Clearly Kara Swischer is a fan girl because Tim Cook is openly gay and a good liberal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PotatoLeekSoup
Until the U.S. reaches manufacturing capabilities...where else can you get 10,000 skilled workers overnight to finish a job? I'm sure that as soon as robots can do 90% of the job (and Apple is most definitely headed there) then Apple will move to the U.S. and won't have to play ball with the Chinese government.

Foxconn will probably have the robots first.
 
Apple is obviously in a much better position relative to Facebook, but Cook still looks awful when he makes broad statements like “I wouldn’t be in this situation” because he’s speculating about hypotheticals and opening himself up to backlash if those become “famous last words” after some unknown future data breach, etc.

That said, Apple has stood up for privacy and they deserve credit for doing so. Let’s hope they don’t get into the advertising business.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jstuts5797
Nice sounding...nonsense. China does not have the concept of human rights. It never had and never will. Foxconn et al work their employees to death literally. It's not much better than slave labor. That's why foreign companies are there. To maximize their profit margins per unit.

Could you give us examples of "Foxconn working their employees to death literally"? I know that kind of thing happened at Samsung factories, with tons of pollution causing cancer and literally killing the employees, but what about Foxconn?
 
Steve Jobs is turning over in his grave as Tim Cook joins those who want him to mix corporate governance with social engineering. Tell that to the tens of millions of Chinese he sold out to the Chinese gov't.
You haven't a clue what SJ would or would not do in today's political environment so just stop with the bumper stickers. Are you ok with the Mercer's, Koch brothers, Adleson, Wynn etc mixing their corporate governance and social engineering? My guess is yes, but I could be wrong.
 
Apple is obviously in a much better position relative to Facebook, but Cook still looks awful when he makes broad statements like “I wouldn’t be in this situation” because he’s speculating about hypotheticals and opening himself up to backlash if those become “famous last words” after some unknown future data breach, etc.

That said, Apple has stood up for privacy and they deserve credit for doing so. Let’s hope they don’t get into the advertising business.
Except it wasn't a breach...
 
  • Like
Reactions: HopefulHumanist
It is sometimes annoying, but Apple just slowly moves playing the long game, not chasing some short term glory offering some numbers in a spec sheet. HomePod will be huge, i can see where Apple is moving with this.
Thoughtful, dead on post.
 
THIS! He is unable to balance profit and customer the was SJ did.
Apple is literally 2X as profitable today than when Jobs was alive and Cook was running the company in 2011 too.

Profit follows when you please your customers. Cook is doing a fantastic job with customers. They love Apple products more than ever if you look at satisfaction, loyalty, and overall unit sales.

Jobs was great, but remember, Cook was closer to Jobs than anyone and was picked by Jobs to run the company. Cook is a genius in his own ways.
 
Last edited:
Why is it we don't see any other Company head talk politics like Timmy?

Oh, yeah. Because it's such a bad idea!

Actually, we live at a time when our government is utterly incapable of doing anything good for its citizens. Someone has to fill the vacuum, and it's corporations.

Getting political alienates half your customers.

Only if you disagree :p

Tim Cook needs to keep his mouth shut about politics, and get Apple back in the right direction of building excellent hardware. They are only a consumer electronics company now. Dell, Microsoft, or HP may be getting my next computing dollars.

Why can't Apple do both? It's not like the two are mutually exclusive. You don't think Bill Gates was (and continues to be) political? He was Chairman of the Board until 2014, but the Gates Foundation was involved politically in many countries well before then.

Steve Jobs knew most of what he said was bullsh*t. The problem with today's Apple is it actually believes its own bullsh*t.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lunarworks
Tim Cook is too political and cares more about profit than the customer. As time goes on this is proven more and more.

I think the only reason Apple is what it is today (post Steve Jobs) is because of Tim Cook's leadership. He may not be doing anything great for the company in terms of innovation, but he's isn't letting it fall apart either. Most execs would love to tear the company apart while profiting personally. Whenever there is a big pot of money, a lot of weird people show up to try and get a piece. It is not easy to keep such a company focused and executing the way Apple has been doing.

It is very important to care about profits especially in the current financial environment. If a company is less profitable that its competitors, they will be put out of business very quickly. Name one company that is still in existence that builds awesome products and that isn't at least as focused on profits.

I would not think he is focused more on profits than on the customer. If Apple didn't care about its customers, they would go elsewhere.
 
Tim Cook tailors his message depending on the audience.


Tim Cook: This Is the Number 1 Reason We Make iPhones in China (It's Not What You Think)

"There's a confusion about China. The popular conception is that companies come to China because of low labor cost. I'm not sure what part of China they go to but the truth is China stopped being the low labor cost country many years ago. And that is not the reason to come to China from a supply point of view. The reason is because of the skill, and the quantity of skill in one location and the type of skill it is."

"China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they're a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously it's the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people."

"The number one reason why we like to be in China is the people. China has extraordinary skills. And the part that's the most unknown is there's almost 2 million application developers in China that write apps for the iOS App Store. These are some of the most innovative mobile apps in the world, and the entrepreneurs that run them are some of the most inspiring and entrepreneurial in the world. Those are sold not only here but exported around the world."

 
Then why bother watching it ?

Is Tim passing himself off as a social engineering expert ?

This is something that someone who wants to get into politics would do.
[doublepost=1523104756][/doublepost]

Did you forget the /S at the end of the post :).

What does /S mean?
 
Yeah, you do need political pressure Tim because you're full of crap
[doublepost=1523131795][/doublepost]
Tim Cook tailors his message depending on the audience.


Tim Cook: This Is the Number 1 Reason We Make iPhones in China (It's Not What You Think)

"There's a confusion about China. The popular conception is that companies come to China because of low labor cost. I'm not sure what part of China they go to but the truth is China stopped being the low labor cost country many years ago. And that is not the reason to come to China from a supply point of view. The reason is because of the skill, and the quantity of skill in one location and the type of skill it is."

"China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they're a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously it's the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people."

"The number one reason why we like to be in China is the people. China has extraordinary skills. And the part that's the most unknown is there's almost 2 million application developers in China that write apps for the iOS App Store. These are some of the most innovative mobile apps in the world, and the entrepreneurs that run them are some of the most inspiring and entrepreneurial in the world. Those are sold not only here but exported around the world."
China didn't start out with so called extraordinary skills. You went there and taught them these skills instead of doing that here in the U.S, because you were able to pay them dirt cheap wages. Stop the non stop bull, Cook. We're not idiots
 
I like Cook as CEO but I'd rather Apple spoke with products and services that were clear on what their vision was. They could spare us the PR tour / social commentary.

Because all this data privacy talk just makes it sound like "this is why Siri isn't that good but you should keep using it because we care about your privacy." What about the Apple users who would opt-in to sharing their data to get a smarter Siri/AI experience.
What about people who dont need a front facing camera on an iPhone? Do you want them to have a different version of iPhone for them? Your point sets a precedent for creating dozens of different products to make sure every single person is satisfied no matter their combination of preferances.

Thats just not how it works.
If u dont mind sharing your info to have a smarter AI, switch to the competition. Simple really;)
 
Nearly $1T valuation and $240B cash. Yep the CEO is clueless. He should resign. What a clueless CEO.

Being political is anti-profitable.

You just proved my point. Tim Cook's political views (liberal, homosexual agenda) have nothing to do with Apple the company. The purpose of a company is solely to make a profit. Apple is not too big to fail and Tim Cook is not the president of a country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PotatoLeekSoup
I guess I just can't see the merits of HomePod. I can't connect it to my home theater and it is very expensive. So what are the things that are going to make it huge. There are other speakers that have voice commands and other music sources. They can be connected to a home theater.
You are complaining that you can't use a device in a way that it wasn't designed to be used in? It does certain things that are stated black on white very clearly. I brought one with me from London and I couldn't be happier with it. Siri understands me just fine and it does all the things that it says it can very well too.
 
We could make a ton of money if we monetized our customers. If our customers were our product. We've elected not to do that. ...We're not going to traffic in your personal life.

This is such an idiotic oportunist comment. Apple already overcharges a premium for their products, they have no point in "monetizing" their customers (whatever that means).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.