Beats is a strong brand, you act like it's something Apple needs to get rid off but that's not their strategy. They've actually incorporated the brand as part of the Apple family, with the Beats branding surviving into Apple's music streaming service as well.Why is beats still a thing? Apple brought beats years ago and STILL doesn't know what to do with it.
Would you imagine Steve Jobs on stage telling "one more thing" and showing this? This single question shows what's the current Apple situation.
Look at Apple's profits. None of the share holders call Cook incompetent, so he's going to stay.I'm really hoping that it won't take a long time before the whole incompetent management (Cook should be the 1st one) will be kicked out forever and old good Apple will return back, where customers will be treated again with respect and not used just as a $ source (while utilising any possible dirty tricks to grab more $ from them).
Obviously they do. Make them sell headphones.Why is beats still a thing? Apple brought beats years ago and STILL doesn't know what to do with it.
Only us UK residents will get this joke!!!Mickey Mouse headphones. Oh the irony.
Apple’s coming products:
Mic Mini
iMic
iPad Pro with a Mickey Mouse
iPhone Mice
iPhone MaxMice
[doublepost=1539759803][/doublepost]
Blamming Japanese for every American business failure is so 1980s.
I fear that’s where things go in a lot of growing companies. I see it all the time among friends working in growing companies in different industries. The business grows. The market grows. The customer base grows, but the executives are pressured/threatened and/or given powerful incentives to actually reduce employee headcount. This is of course to drive down labor costs and ultimately please Wall Street more than anything else. It’s harmful long term. But it’s hard to get investors and boards of directors to look long term anymore. Too many want to get while the getting is good and move on to plundering the next company.I have a similar but different take on Apple being distracted and releasing these products.
Beats products still seem to be run somewhat as a separate company.
But within Apple, there aren't strict divisions by product and they seem to operate like a company much smaller than their actual size with inability to maintain multiple foci.
When the original iPhone was coming out, Apple announced they had to delay Mac OS X Leopard because they had put their engineers on iPhone.
That might have made sense at the time when iPhone was fledgling, but it seems like a trillion dollar company should have more ability to do multiple things at the same time. If you look at the number of employees they have compared to their revenues, it's a really small employee base. I think they traditionally just had one product (the Mac) and they still operate like a company that can only do much at a time. They make come out with a new product but then just move the people who made that product onto another team. With the amount of stability in the markets of both the iPhone and the Mac, they should have dedicated and separate teams doing regular updates. Although maybe the cash in the iPhone is too large to see the benefit for the Mac (plus that Tim Cook thinks the iPad will replace the Mac).
Anyhow, all that is to say I don't fault Beats for iterating, even if the iteration is Mickey Mouse. There's no reason Apple couldn't dedicate the resources to Mac development in the same way, except that it seems to against their corporate culture where it's like a school of fish all going in the same direction—and likely also that all development probably goes through the head execs and Jony Ives' very small design team rather than trusting delegation.
I’m not one of them but some people are avid collectors of Mickey Mouse and I’d be willing to bet that this will be popular especially as Christmas gets close.
Is Beats part of Apple Inc?He’s taken a job with beats has he?