It is the only service that's cross plattform, yes, but it shows that Apple is willed to open it's services if necessary.Great, so is that like the once service that is cross platform? Besides, Spotify is much much better than Apple Music.
It is the only service that's cross plattform, yes, but it shows that Apple is willed to open it's services if necessary.Great, so is that like the once service that is cross platform? Besides, Spotify is much much better than Apple Music.
Spotify is much much better than Apple Music
Not yet, yes, that's why I mentioned iTunes.Last time I checked you can't open it up in a web browser.
Really? I'm an Apple Music user and I'm very happy with it, how is Spotify any better?
It's about the money.So Apple abandons some products because they're not part of a core focus, or at least seemingly abandons them. Now they imagine themselves a media conglomerate? Talk about a weird pivot. If Apple tries to go this route then they will have utterly jumped the shark.
If they do this I think they really have to look at themselves and ask what kind of company are they? They used to be a computer company, then a device and part time computer company. Are they trying to be Amazon? Comcast? Warning! Identity crisis ahead!
Well, discover weekly is absolutely amazing. It's always spot on for me. Giving me a list of new songs to listen to and I typically add 3-4 songs per week to playlists of mine. They have tons of remixes of song which I have yet to find on Apple Music or Amazon Music Unlimited. And also, the navigation is dead simple. I tried Apple Music when it first came out, that was a no go, and then after the re-design, still doesn't make sense. The fact that apple claims to make things "just work" and "dead simple" does not apply to the Apple Music app. And lets not even get into how they screwed up local/purchased music libraries.
I've lost a lot of faith in them in doing things right and being "seamless". It often ends up with wasting a weekend to sort things out.
What does one have to do with the other?So they have the resources for TV shows, but can't keep their hardware updated? You suck Apple.
Apple should just pony-up and buy Disney. Game over.
£200 in the UK.. because.. you know.. the weak pound...Only $99 per episode!
This company is completely unfocused and all over the place. First cars, then this?
Makes no sense to me. I'd think they would be working towards anTV service, similar to
Music. Unlimited shows and movies on iTunes for let's say $40 a month? I'd pay $50, easily. I feel like that would be a better strategy. Then maybe add original content into the
TV service that is exclusive.
TVs) and if they create content that people like and want to see people will buy
TVs in order to see it.
TV and... some amazing product deep inside Apple that hasn't seen the light of day yet?
TV from a hobby to a major focus then creating exclusive content is something they have to do. It's just the nature of that particular beast.Apple should have just bought Time Warner/HBO.
Westworld was very, very, very good. It'd be hard to compete with that.
Probably be for US only lol.
That's not the same thing at all.
Apple is trying to create ANOTHER reason to stay in their ecosystem. This is exactly why Netflix has shows like Fuller House or 'Orange is the New Black'. This is exactly why Amazon buys exclusive rights to Mr. Robot, or has their own shows like 'The Man in the High Castle'.
For HBO to enter the smartphone/desktop/laptop business is laughable. It's not the same thing.
When you have a service, you (1) advertise it and (2) make it better than others (and one way is through exclusives)
Except they wouldn't need to be fishing for additional reasons to stay in their ecosystem if everything worked like it was supposed to.