Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I take pictures on my iPad or iPhone and they show up on iPhoto on my Mac. Couldn't be easier.
 
photo

If I recall correctly,
the iphoto replacement on OS X was announced for March 2015. So yes, we are waiting for it, but the whole thing is not overdue! And yes they I expect them to give 10 to 15G instead of 5 for free as the 5 we currently have, will not cut it.
Looking forward though,

T
 
I think iCloud is actually a great service and despite it's growing pains, it has now accomplished many feats of implementing cloud features for the average Joe:

- An email account
- Contact, calendar and reminder backup/syncing
- iOS device backups
- Find My iPhone

There are other features too, and newer ones that aren't quite perfectly intuitive, but they work. Photos definitely needs some cross-functional help, as it runs across iCloud, iOS and OS X.

Except the email service is total garbage. Emails not deleting (keep coming back), push being very unreliable, emails not deleting on other devices when you delete on iPhone, etc etc etc.

Sorry Apple, but Microsoft and Exchange win this time. Still baffles me how the richest company on the planet is incapable of doing push notifications and synchronization properly, something even BlackBerry had basically mastered over a decade ago.
 
Apple needs a new CEO.

Actually No. You think someone from the outside is going to magically be like Steve Jobs. Hardly. Tim Cook knows Apple because he is from the inside. And Steve personally chose him. Remember what happened to Apple when they ousted Steve and brought that idiot John Sculley? Uh huh. Yeah.
 
And Google is starting to really nail their products too. The new Maps, Gmail, and Calendar for Android are simply outstanding. Google Now on Android is brilliant. Apple is not doing so well in software and services these days. They're much sloppier than they used to be.

Yea. . . I'm still not touching Google with 20 ft pole :p
 
What about Ping? Or the original iPod earbuds? Not many agree with me, but I would vote for iTunes Match. Horrible for me though it seems most people had a better experience.

iTunes Match has been pretty terrible for me too. It gradually wrecked all my song ratings, destroyed genius playlists over the course of the last 18 months. I tried wiping resetting eveything so I could re-rate my songs. It started working and then suddenly the next day most of the song ratings were reset again. Most, not all, some of the ratings stuck locally and in the cloud.

Editing song data such as genre also get lost. I tried changing the Taylor Swift track "Shake It Off" from Genre "Country" to "Pop" 20 times. The change never appears to get synced with the cloud, and my local iTunes copy goes back to Genre "Country" within a day. And it's done this for hundreds of other tracks too.

I've just gone back to using a local iTunes library now.

An utter mess for me but i know others are having a great iTunes Match experience. So I refuse to criticise Apple too harshly.
 
Not to troll (honestly), but I've personally never been much of a fan of OS X -- for many reasons which I won't bother to list here. While previous versions of Mac OS obviously had their limitations, OS X has some fundamental differences that made it no longer feel like "Mac" to me (and, yes, I know it's been out for 13 years now) and also less pleasurable to use...

Well, I think you're in the minority with your opinion. Mac OS X is leagues better to use than the Classic Mac OS.
 
Except the email service is total garbage. Emails not deleting (keep coming back), push being very unreliable, emails not deleting on other devices when you delete on iPhone, etc etc etc.

Sorry Apple, but Microsoft and Exchange win this time. Still baffles me how the richest company on the planet is incapable of doing push notifications and synchronization properly, something even BlackBerry had basically mastered over a decade ago.

Nope, works fine.
 
Dear Apple,

Buy a little company called Picturelife. These people and their software will solve all your problems and is exactly how photos should be done in the cloud.
How is stuff like this free? Will it stay free? If not, will I be able to afford it after I grow dependent on it?

Except that I won't touch Google with a 10ft pole. I use YouTube (sadly, Google bought them), and the Google News page. That's it. No way in hell I'd use their email, or their search, or their maps, or Google Drive, etc., etc. Google's mantra used to be "Don't Be Evil" Well, not anymore. **** 'em. I can't stand that company. Their entire business model is spying and collecting data on people who use their products and selling it for advertising. Their email has ****ing AD's in it because computers read your mail. No. Thank. You.

Just so you don't feel alone I shall second this.
 
I have found iCloud to be wonderful for my purposes. Editing a document on one device and having it appear ready fo editing on another without the need to sync anything or save to a folder is fabulous.
 
Well the fact is, Steve is dead (and it's his own fault he's dead too). People need to stop whining and MOVE ON.

So you're saying you're discounting the fact that 2 completely different people are running the company differently.

People "whining" doesn't change this fact. Tim Cook is running a mess of Apple. This is a fact. iCloud, Maps, 8.0.1, you name it. This is Tim Cook's Apple.

Understand this: The products Apple is releasing don't compete even remotely with more mature offerings. Apple needs to step its game. Why go with iCloud Photo Library when Picturelife or Dropbox's Carsousel are INFINITELY better. Why go with Maps, when Google has the process locked down? Why use iWork, when MS Office is vastly better and more robust and continuously updated?

Apple is a one trick pony. iPhone. Everything else they try to make is inferior.
 
That guy is being a Drama Queen.

In fact, MacRumors Forums are FULL of Drama Queens. Geezus.

I tend to agree. I also, reluctantly, find myself agreeing more and more that there are major products coming out of Apple (iCloud and iWork being the biggest on my radar) that simply don't compete with the market. These are disturbing warning signs that the company is struggling.
 
How is stuff like this free? Will it stay free? If not, will I be able to afford it after I grow dependent on it?

Just so you don't feel alone I shall second this.

The first 8GB is free. 100GB is $100 AND you get to share that with 2 other people with their own accounts. $150 you can go unlimited, up to 3 people, each on their own account.

Most people need only 100GB. It grows with you for $50 more once you're passed the 100GB limit.
 
Maybe they should reconsider their decision to scrap Aperture. :rolleyes:
And maybe they should consider getting away from this insane yearly OS release nonsense. They are clearly releasing things not yet ready for prime time (iOS 8, OSX 10.10).

The "core rot" at Apple is getting worse.

10.10 was fine because of public beta testing. IOS 8 was a failure.
 
Apple dropping the ball again with services. Shocking...not. Tim Cook has had it easy with iterative releases of successful products like iPhone, iPad, etc. But iCloud still has a long way to go, and the supply chain master clearly isn't a product guy, so who knows what kind of guidance iCloud is getting at the CEO level. Maybe none while he lets lower level people fight it out. Time to earn your millions, Tim. Get it together.
 
Many folks here living in the past (or at least that seems to be where their expectations for Apple are). Have you taken a good look around lately when go to the Apple Store. Look at the people there. The flotsam and jetsam of John and Jane Does gawking at the latest electronic marvel. Shelves full of (often garish looking) overpriced accessories.

Now let's add a sympathetic press corps slavishly ooing and aaahing at the bling bling version of the Apple Watch dangling from the wrist of fashion models while Bono, complete with his de rigeur sunglasses, apologizes for ramming the latest masterpiece down our throats whether we like it or not.

What does this have to do with iCloud ? Nothing. That's the point. Apple is too bloated to innovate any longer and without a once in a lifetime captain at the healm like Steve Jobs, is barreling down the path of every other large bloated company. " Hey look we just paid billions to buy a boatload of bass heavy designer headphones, and hey they even threw in a second rate streaming service to boot" !

Cheers

Every product that Apple makes can fit on one table. That is not too "bloated".
 
However, at this point in time there is a Metadata bug. I can't believe other people haven't talked much about it. With older scanned photos I create a metadata header and then edit the metadata and upload them the iCloud Photo library ... but it won't read the time information. I have tried using iPhoto, Picasa, Adobe Bridge and a command-line tool to change the metadata without success. I am thinking that if they are still working on macro-level aspects of this service it might be months before a small bug like this is fixed.:confused:

I had this problem as well. What I did was this:

1. Import the photos into iPhoto, and set the date/time for each photo (or use the batch change option) within iPhoto.

2. Choose "share" in the lower right of the iPhoto window, and chose iCloud Photo Stream.

3. On the iOS device, go to the photo stream that was just created (called iCloud Photo Sharing on iOS), and save those images to the device. Then delete the photo stream if desired.

Every time I have done this, the images have been placed in the Years/Collections/Moments correctly.

Videos are another story - I haven't had success getting them to reliably appear where they should, and location data for photos is hit or miss as well. Sometimes it carries over and sometimes it does not. I'm still trying to work that out.

Hope this helps.
 
No iCloud for me

I don't want to trust the iCloud for anything. There are 4 macs in my household and 3 iPhones. Every single one has iCloud disabled.

If the new Photos app will work locally only then I will use it. Otherwise I will stick to iPhoto. I sync what I want to sync between devices, do my backups myself.
 
I don't want to trust the iCloud for anything. There are 4 macs in my household and 3 iPhones. Every single one has iCloud disabled.

If the new Photos app will work locally only then I will use it. Otherwise I will stick to iPhoto. I sync what I want to sync between devices, do my backups myself.

There are two types of technology users. Those that adapt, and those that don't adapt. Don't be in the second group, you won't be happy.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.