Ohh that's a nice colour match!
Nice, can't wait for your pictures
Yeah the fact they are asking $85 dollars for a case that actually has less material because of the massive cut out is CRAZY work. I love my leather limitless for 16 pro, but I don’t know if I can condone that price hike.Mous carbon fiber is in. It’s way over priced for what it is, that sai, definitely a high quality build, the cc button seems to still be able to be taken out but would require a lot of force. The tpu sides are dim everywhere, which is a positive. That said, my black tech woven is a better deal imo.
Tomorrow is the true test l- when my cactus is set to arrive.
Norween is nicer to hold than the Ecco, it’s not pebbly just not slippery and patinas way better too, Ecco just gets shiny and smudgy, I got it free but if buying now would only get the horween myself.I only care about how smooth and soft it feels. I don’t like those that feel like plastic or pebbled leather.
But I don’t think that’s the case, not even with the regular Ecco leather, right?
View attachment 2549094
This saw this from another forum, not sure how legit but thought this needs heads up if true:
Apple's guideline for case makers explicitly requires the grey area to not be "obstructed with metal or other conductive material including on the sidewalls". This likely have to do with the new arrangement of placing antennas around the edge of the "plateau". In other words, cases with metal there may hinder wireless reception.
Is it worth it to get Lens protecters? Never had ever considered it in the past.So probably a bad idea, eh?
Fiddlesticks
![]()
JETech Camera Lens Protector
JETech Camera Lens Protector, Full Coverage 9H Tempered Glass Ring Cover, Matte Metal Plate, Case Friendly, 1-Packa.co
From the photo, yes for the Pro’sI wonder if we can assume this only applies to the Pro since it has the solid metal “plateau”? The Air’s back is all glass like the 16 series…
Talking about the frame ( thats transparent but photo doesn’t give it justice ) or the white block where the Apple logo on the back ( thats solid white )Can anyone confirm the lower portion of Apple’s clear case for 17 pro max is solid white instead of clear? I kind of like the two tone look.
View attachment 2549106
It’s solid white.Can anyone confirm the lower portion of Apple’s clear case for 17 pro max is solid white instead of clear? I kind of like the two tone look.
View attachment 2549106
View attachment 2549128
Hello, I need some advice on picking up a case for iPhone 17 base model. I had various cases for my iPhone 13 (Mous, Spigen, Tech21, Nomad) and my favorite was Caudabe Sheath. But I feel some other brands improved their cases in the meantime, so the choice is difficult. For 17 I want to just pick one and I can’t decide between Mous case, Caudabe Sheath, caudabe Paragon, DBrand Grip or Spigen Ultra Hybrid Zero One. Some other suggestions welcome, of course! I’m in Europe so I don’t have some options like Speck for example.
Air cases lol.What ya got there?
I raised my concern about this here and here.View attachment 2549094
This saw this from another forum, not sure how legit but thought this needs heads up if true:
Apple's guideline for case makers explicitly requires the grey area to not be "obstructed with metal or other conductive material including on the sidewalls". This likely have to do with the new arrangement of placing antennas around the edge of the "plateau". In other words, cases with metal there may hinder wireless reception.
No there was no source cited, the guy was posting in my local discussion thread on just iPhone 17 series cases, just like this thread. But honestly the CAD-ish writings looks quite legit. The previous guidelines looked similar. And it makes a lot of physical sense anyway.
When I first saw the antenna bands “connected” to the camera bump, I had concerns. I’m in agreement with you.No there was no source cited, the guy was posting in my local discussion thread on just iPhone 17 series cases, just like this thread. But honestly the CAD-ish writings looks quite legit. The previous guidelines looked similar. And it makes a lot of physical sense anyway.