A person cannot buy good character. And, it does not matter who is the victim of the person of bad character either.There is nothing immoral about taking advantage of trillion dollar companies
A person cannot buy good character. And, it does not matter who is the victim of the person of bad character either.There is nothing immoral about taking advantage of trillion dollar companies
A person cannot buy good character. And, it does not matter who is the victim of the person of bad character either.
If they run out and purchase the item without doing any research and thoughtful analysis ahead of time to determine what their actual best use and needs would be, then, yes, IMHO it IS abuse, especially if they have bought another similar item at the same time in order to compare the two.If someone is 'abusing' the return policy, then yes it's morally wrong. If they use the return window to determine whether the device meets their needs, then that is not abuse.
So what about, say, shoplifting from Apple, then? They're a trillion dollar company. Is shoplifting something from their store immoral? They can afford it.There is nothing immoral about taking advantage of trillion dollar companies
Agree with all that. Purchasing, unboxing and using multiple devices knowing you will only keep one seems like abuse to me. Just my opinion.If they run out and purchase the item without doing any research and thoughtful analysis ahead of time to determine what their actual best use and needs would be, then, yes, IMHO it IS abuse, especially if they have bought another similar item at the same time in order to compare the two.
That said, sure, sometimes people buy something with all the best intentions and then once they have it in hand and are using it they realize that..... "uh-oh, this really isn't what I need," or "this device is causing problems I had not anticipated," and in those situations it is perfectly reasonable to return the item with an honest explanation of why the return was felt to be necessary.
It's the people who purchase two or three similar items at the same time or close to it with even before the purchases been completed, actually having the intention of returning the one(s) not suiting them after all for whatever valid or silly reasons who are the real problems for retailers, especially ones like Apple with its generous return policy.
Corporations are organizations comprising of people but what does that have to do with a person's character?Keep pretending corporations are people
In the US, at least, all purchases from authorized dealers can be returned within 14 days, longer around Christmas.Premium prices = premium returns policy… coupled with the fact you only get said returns policy when purchasing directly from Apple which cuts out the middle man, thus earning Apple more money on each sale.
On top of this consumers generally pay more for products directly from Apple as they never have sales or reductions in prices etc…
I don't follow your last sentence, but this isn't about whether Apple should have the return policy, it's about its cost to Apple, which is being passed on, same as with the other costs of producing and selling the product.That doesn't follow.
If return policy => higher profit, then no return policy => lower profit. If Apple's making less money, they aren't going to cut consumer prices even further.
I could agree with you a trillion timesHow about this for you:
Imagine at night Tim Cook bathes himself in $100 bills. Sleeps on a stack of $100 bills shaped like a king size pillow. Wakes up and makes $100 sandwiches then his henchmens haul him to the office in a wagon and he is sitting on a throne made of $100 bills.
Let me just say that I don't give one flying **** about returning anything apple. You dig?
Point 2. Chickens and eggs! why should people who don’t take a very relaxed view of a purchase subsidise those who do? Maybe apple should charge a modest 2% restocking fee so only people who do this pay for it?Just a few points:
- Apple is doing very well and reporting record profits, so you may use and abuse the return policy as much as you can that you will not hurt the company.
- The costs with the implementation of the return policy are already included in the price of the products. Do not feel bad about using the return policy, you are already paying for it.
- Apple does not think twice before taking advantage of its position, be it to raise prices, threaten other companies, or abuse its monopolies. It is business as usual, and I do not see why consumers should not do the same.
It’s about your own actions, always. It‘s a slippery slope to judge your morality this way. if a homeless man breaks into your home, because you’re far wealthier than him, is that OK?Keep pretending corporations are people
I’d love to know!Those returned MBP 2021’s will be your refurbished models in 6 months. You have Luke Miani to thank for that.
Question I have to ask regarding this topic, what does Apple do with the hundreds of review units they send out around the world when they are returned? Do they wipe them and sell
them to Apple employees at a discount? Give them Craig to run nightly builds of macOS vNext?
I don't follow your last sentence, but this isn't about whether Apple should have the return policy, it's about its cost to Apple, which is being passed on, same as with the other costs of producing and selling the product.
Even Apple itself doesn’t care much.Point 2. Chickens and eggs! why should people who don’t take a very relaxed view of a purchase subsidise those who do? Maybe apple should charge a modest 2% restocking fee so only people who do this pay for it?
Point 3. Two wrongs don’t make a right ?
Even Apple itself doesn’t care much.
Saturday I wanted to try how the Airpods 3 fit my ears, the AppleStore Guy said there is no way to try them in Store. All I can do is, buy them, try and bring them back if I don’t like. So I bought them, unwrapped directly in Store, tried and I didn’t like the fit, and told him, okay now I want to return them.