In other news, Honda will discontinue 2017 Civic when 2018 Civic is released.
Haha
Good one
In other news, Honda will discontinue 2017 Civic when 2018 Civic is released.
Except that the '2018 iPhone X' (or XI or Xs) will have almost certainly have the same exact industrial design.iPhone X will be like the PowerMac Cube. Gorgeous, expensive, and short lived.
Apple's margin on the iPhone X is lower than on the iPhone 8. The largest cost driver is the display for which Samsung is charging Apple a lot as they are the only manufacturer able to produce an OLED display with this quality. The FaceID components are also more expensive than the TouchID sensor.Apple became so short-sighted now, they only think they could make a huge pile of cash with the X, but didn't think of the aftermath...
1) You mean the security of throttling my phone, marketed as "security?"
2) Great, another dongle to carry. Can't charge my phone and listen to headphones with a dongle.
3) Wireless Charging.. who cares? I don't have to take the .02 seconds out of my life to plug something in?
You do know that they are only getting rid of the 2017 iPhone X. The 2018 iPhone X (or Xs) will have pretty much the same industrial design with upgraded internal components.Good move getting rid of the X though, that's just one big fail that's best forgotten about.
The steel is also a bit less slippery than aluminium. Overall, the X is significantly less slippery for me compared to the 6.Glass is less slippery than your iPhone 6+ aluminium, I held an X just the other day, thought it felt very comfortable in my hands, not slippery at all, and it was flying.
#1 reason why I didn't buy iPhone X. Feel like there's a large cohort of customers who would appreciate smaller devices with great specs but Apple doesn't seem to agree. Instead we got the X that is heavier, thicker, and larger than the 7 was. My sweet spot right now is the 7, which is lighter and thinner than the 8 but still has 256GB that the SE does not have. Hoping this year they satisfy people like myself with a device that isn't bigger than the 7 but has great tech
I have seen it, but thank you for the heads up. The whole situation is fascinating. A great example of how Apple often has to wait for technology to catch up to their vision.Actually that tech is somewhat available.
Not sure if you've seen the coverage, but Vivo released a phone with synaptics fingerprint scanner underneath the screen and I think Samsung have just got a patent for front facing camera/sensor underneath the screen.
I swear people simply don't read these articles..You do know that they are only getting rid of the 2017 iPhone X. The 2018 iPhone X (or Xs) will have pretty much the same industrial design with upgraded internal components.
Apple's margin on the iPhone X is lower than on the iPhone 8. The largest cost driver is the display for which Samsung is charging Apple a lot as they are the only manufacturer able to produce an OLED display with this quality. The FaceID components are also more expensive than the TouchID sensor.
The steel is also a bit less slippery than aluminium. Overall, the X is significantly less slippery for me compared to the 6.
I dunno, while I do understand the use of numbers and encouraging upgrades, I do think they're going to move away from it. I can't see where they're going to go with it. iPhone 11, 12, 13? Or are they going to be roman numerals? The naming honestly starts to sound a bit stupid like that.
This is just my preference, but I'd love to see a cleaner lineup:
iPhone X
iPhone
iPhone SE
And maybe a Plus variation for the X and iPhone. There's enough there to spread and hit many price points.
Yes, the absolute margin on the iPhone X is higher than on the iPhone 8 (or 8 Plus). But the absolute margin on an iMac is higher still. Show me a company whose relative margins decrease for their more expensive products.Everything I've read shows the percentage margins on the X are extremely comparable to the 8, and the absolute dollars of profit for each X are quite a bit higher than the 8. The screen reportedly is costing about $70 more than the LCD unit on the 8 Plus (I've also heard $70 total, but who knows), the FaceID module is about $15 more than TouchID, and the stainless frame costs $15 more, so ultimately you've got component costs that are around $100 higher than an 8 Plus yet the iPhone X costs $200 more.
Interesting. I couldn’t love the swipes and new gestures of the iPhone X more. Invoking multi-tasking is so elegant and natural. Frustrates me to have to go back to the slower, less intuitive home button interface of my iPad Pro.
What exactly about iOS do you feel doesn’t work smoothly on iPhone X?
The Bluetooth, alarm clock and battery percentage icons don’t matter that much to me. Especially if it means a quarter inch of screen real estate.YEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!
Then I could have back all that info that was previously visible with a quick glance, without pulling down the notifications.
Because of the price, Apple put themselves in a damned if you do, damned if you don’t situation. Whatever they decide there are going to be unhappy people.Unexpected, but as his phone is quite expensive, I can already hear the cries of foul if they drop the price on this.
The Bluetooth, alarm clock and battery percentage icons don’t matter that much to me. Especially if it means a quarter inch of screen real estate.
There is a software solution that might make the notch work better for some folks like you: allow users to customize which icons are in the top “ears”. In general, I wish Apple would allow users greater control over their preferred interface configs, through the OS. It is a pointless bit of stubbornness that I hope they get over soon.
The Bluetooth, alarm clock and battery percentage icons don’t matter that much to me. Especially if it means a quarter inch of screen real estate.
For next year i expect this:
iPhone X 2: $899
iPhone X 2+: $1099
iPhone X SE: $699 (released together with the other models this time)
iPhone 8: $599 (with less color and storage options as usual)
(prices are for lowest storage options)
But the point is that the notch exists because of the camera, not because they wanted an asymmetrical bezel. So in other words, you would rather simply have a black band across the top where the camera resides instead of using the extra space on either side of the camera for useful information.And I would gladly deal with a bigger phone and asymmetrical bezels (just a top bezel) if I could get a 6’4inch screen iphone with no notch at all, and a fingerprint scanner on the back.
This surprises me. When was the last time they ever did this? First gen iPhone?
Again, not sure sure you’re grasping what assumption means in colloquial use. What assumption did I make? You literally chaffed at my responses, which were neither personal nor derogatory, and then demanded I never reply to another one of your posts! I didn’t make an “assumption” that you were touchy because you were clearly, observably touchy.Perhaps it was a tad bit harsh, but that is all. You’re making yet another assumption, which is quite ironic if you ask me...
But the point is that the notch exists because of the camera, not because they wanted an asymmetrical bezel. So in other words, you would rather simply have a black band across the top where the camera resides instead of using the extra space on either side of the camera for useful information.