That’s right! I demand another charger to put unused into the drawer with its brethren!If they don’t at least include the power brick with the pro’s then they lost their minds.
That’s right! I demand another charger to put unused into the drawer with its brethren!If they don’t at least include the power brick with the pro’s then they lost their minds.
Ha! I get it! Because it’s flat it’s really just the same phone even though it is completely different!An exquisite thinner box for the exquisite iPhone 4/5 redesigned iPhone 12!
You do realize that the 5W one still works right? You are proving Apple's point. In no universe would they have included an 18/20W charger it would have been a 5W. So are you complaining you are not getting another 5W charger that you won't use and still go buy the 18/20W?It's hard for me to belive it.
I have and iPhone 7, so I have power brick.. but 5W. So with new iPhone I have to either buy one 18/20W from apple or one from third party company.
This. is. just. stupic. lol
I really hope they don't go for the words "exquisite thinner box" when they're announcing it on stage.
Safety reasons? You realize that wearing earphones while driving is illegal most places, right?And let's not forget why Apple has always shipped EarPods in the first place. Even though they are not legally required to do so (everywhere), they ensure that handsfree accessories are provided with every iPhone sold, for safety reasons. It would be a pretty poor decision to stop including a handsfree accessory.
I am for Apple doing this as it will have a huge environmental impact with the volume of devices they sell each year...
Please quantify for all us the exact nature of the environmental impact that it will have.
- By slimming down the packaging and reducing the gross weight and shipping dimensions, fewer resources are allegedly needed to ship them, saving Apple a lot of money. Can you provide the exact details on the amount of fuel not burned because of this (and proof that this will actually be the case and not just negated by other transport practices) and then also the direct environmental impact from that exact reduction in emissions? I'd be interested to see how this would amount to something in the face of China outdoing the entire world on emissions 1000x over.
- Can you share specific details on exactly how many chargers and EarPods are discarded every year due to the specific reason that the person doesn't need them? From that, can you provide the specific environmental impact details that from number of discarded chargers and EarPods? That will be fascinating too considering most people do not throw away brand new things, and instead hold on to them for the future, or give them to people who need them, or sell them.
...or are you just doing what everyone else is doing and guessing that there must be SOME environmental impact even if you cannot possibly comprehend or codify it. Yeah, that's what I thought.
I was reading this thread, and liking/disliking some of the posts when it hit me. This whole thread is ridiculous.
The iPhone is a device that needs to be charged in order to work. It should be included in the box. Citing environmental reasons that people already have chargers etc. is just making excuses for a company that considers itself a boutique brand, but is nickel and diming its customers.
Put a damn charger in the box. This is one case where thinking outside the box is just not good old fashioned common sense. If this rumor is true, I believe it’s going to hurt Apple’s image no matter how they try and spin it.
The next time I buy a winter coat, I hope they include a hood. Maybe when Coach sells briefcases, they should sell the shoulder strap separately. Shoes? I have shoelaces from another pair I can use.
Okay. I’m done.
Edit: Fixed typo.
Who said it had anything to do with driving?Safety reasons? You realize that wearing earphones while driving is illegal most places, right?
Getting less is giving you choice? That's some twisted logic.That's subjective. I think it's bad etiquette to fill the world with superfluous chargers.
What's objective fact is that currently you have no choice - all new iPhones come with a charger; this new approach adds choice.
And that's the logical fallacy here...assuming that anything/everything that falls under a certain category will have an meaningful environmental impact, and that's simply not true. Environmental issues are much more complicated and nuanced than that. You can't just conclude that such minor changes will have a net positive impact somewhere. It just doesn't work that way.If i hold a pencil in mid-air and then drop it, i can be sure that it will fall to the ground at SOME rate, even if i cannot quantify it.
So when everyone who purchases an iPhone now also purchases a charger, somehow that's OK with you? Somehow those chargers are not superfluous because they were purchased instead of included?That's subjective. I think it's bad etiquette to fill the world with superfluous chargers.
What's objective fact is that currently you have no choice - all new iPhones come with a charger; this new approach adds choice.
We know they are using less paper. We know that a percentage of chargers go unused and thus didn’t need to be made in the first place. We know the same amount of phones will weigh less and thus use less fuel to transport. We know they can now use the same sku worldwide and not need to ship different chargers for different countries. There are a lot of data points, and very few that point in the direction of WORSE environmental effect.And that's the logical fallacy here...assuming that anything/everything that falls under a certain category will have an meaningful environmental impact, and that's simply not true. Environmental issues are much more complicated and nuanced than that. You can't just conclude that such minor changes will have a net positive impact somewhere. It just doesn't work that way.
[automerge]1593615413[/automerge]
So when everyone who purchases an iPhone now also purchases a charger, somehow that's OK with you? Somehow those chargers are not superfluous because they were purchased instead of included?
It is funny to me to see how all forms of comprehensible logic are thrown out the window by people who want to virtue signal fo some vague concept of "enviro-concern". That's what I'm seeing here.
I understand that this is a way for them to eat the cost of the new 5G antenae. "Cut where we can"Would be ironic if the cost savings from removing the accessories went to cover the costs of redesigning the packaging.
I think the right way to do this properly is to offer either a discount on a charger within say x weeks of buying a new phone, or straight up offering chargers for a very low price. So it's not as big a slap as you first think.
It just hurts those moving to Apple for the first time, when they are the people you want to deliver the "wow" to!
Knowing Apple, I think that'll what they do in this case. Say these things are not needed but not drop the price.they will probably proudly announce that the iPhone will come with the "incredible new technology 5G" while keeping the same price*
*ignoring the fact that it will come without charger or earphones, saving them some extra bugs, probably even on distrubtion
As an alternative they will present some pretty charts showing how many people have already a lot of chargers at home and that Apple does it's best to be environmental, by giving customers, who still need one, the opportunity, to purchase the incredible new charger individually at only "xy dollars"
also decrease in shipping cost for the entire packaging being lighter.I don't see why all the hate. I've been waiting for years that they do this, it's just stupid creating waste by giving a charger with every products. As it is, it gives little extra value to the product.
Still, considering the cost of manufacturing of the phone is the same, I would expect a price decrease as well.
Radio terminals intended to be connected to a network open to the public for the provision of telephone service cannot be marketed without an accessory making it possible to limit the 'exposure of the head to radio emissions during communications' . In other words, it is impossible to sell the iPhone without its headphones within the European Union.
There will be earphone in the box, at least in France
This is a transcription of an EU law as described by Consomac
Exactly, I have no idea why people on here don’t understand that including a charger in millions of iPhone boxes isn’t better for the environment. A large majority of comments have stated that Apple still ships a 5W charger on all but the pro models, which no one uses anyway! And safety issues by including headphones? What?I've always sold my power bricks with the phone when I upgrade so I don't have that many chargers lying around.
However, with everything (in theory) using USB-C as the charging port moving forward there is no need to have a charger with every device. You probably just need 1 powerful one for laptops and then a 1/2 smaller ones for phones and other accessories.
If I got a USB-C to Micro-USB cable I wouldn't need any USB-A type plugs.