It's really short-sighted to expect apple to start killing consumer product lines when their market share is increasing every quarter.
Give it up - you'll only raise your (or you're) blood pressure. I've been straightening people out on this for decades. And even when it takes, it's (or its) only for awhile....and the one negative vote is for what reason?
__________________
IT'S = contraction of IT IS It's nice.
ITS = Possessive Its color...
YOU'RE = contraction of YOU ARE You're nice!
YOUR = Possessive Your Mac is..
I'm going to predict:
- MacBook white discontinued
- MacBook Air becomes the standard MacBook
I think the line-up for laptops will be something like this for at least the next 6 months.
Macbook Air 11" Core 2 Duo
MacBook Air 13" Core 2 Duo
MacBook Pro 15" Sandy Bridge i5 and/or i7, NVidia GPU
MacBook Pro 17" Sandy Bridge i5 and/or i7, NVidia GPU
All models will come with SSD storage as standard.
All models will not have an optical drive.
We'll see a complete redesign for the Pro line with more space for battery.
http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-graphics-developers-guides/It is DirectX 10.1 hardware. Show proof that it actually supports GPGPU in DirectX. It doesn't have OpenCL as per Intel.
AMD Fusion is DirectX 11. Llano has been advanced to Q2.
aww my 3000 dollar i7 mbp from early 2010 is gonna be outdated![]()
why does apple glorify an ipod, iphone, ipad update. But MacBook Pro Updates are silent?!
This is bullsht. MacBook Pro 17" Core i5 2.53GHz models available at Amazon right now....IN STOCK:
http://www.amazon.com/Apple-MacBook...ref=sr_1_1?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1296084547&sr=1-1
I don't know where MacRumors is getting this false information.
The new MacBook Pros won't be out until at least February 20th.
MacBook Pro 17" Core i5 2.53GHz models available at Amazon right now....IN STOCK:
http://www.amazon.com/Apple-MacBook...ref=sr_1_1?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1296084547&sr=1-1
I don't know where MacRumors is getting this false information.
The new MacBook Pros won't be out until at least February 20th.
EDIT: I see they are shipping these from J&R Computer World, where they have them in stock, not directly from Amazon.
Can't wait for a refresh - however we normally see case leaks, blurry photos, etc if there is something coming out in the near future.
I haven't seen anything - I hope this means they don't simply make some internal changes and leave the casing the same.![]()
The Pro would carry both an SSD and a 2.5" HD. I see the base configuration coming with a 64GB SSD + 500 GB HD. That can optionally be upgraded to 256GB SSD + 1TB HD.Agree on SSD, but maybe with a slight delay on the Pro models? Unless they have a standard drive where the SuperDrive used to be? Pro users like me will have a hard time dealing with 128/256gb options, and 512GB SSD are currently prohibitively expensive. Though I might have to get along with toting one of those WD Elements 1TB 2.5" drives that are only around $100 right now.
It would be cool if the new MBP beat the iPad 2.0 to market. Also, doesn't it make sense to get it out sooner so buyers won't just wait until MBPs start shipping with Lion?
That's great, I just bought a 15" Core i5 MBP.....thanks....![]()
Today's best notebooks are faster than the two years ago desktops that were "fine" for video editing - at least CPU-wise and the graphics finally seem on the edge of "getting there."I'm afraid fringe users like yourself may be left to come up with creative solutions. I'm starting to see again a real distinction between laptop (tablet)
and desktop. Editing videos and sounds on a laptop is incredibly painful IMHO. It is just slower and the interface is not ideal. Most professionals and amateurs like myself prefer a desktop for video work. I just can't imagine creating a short youtube video with several hours of footage as raw material on a laptop. I guess you only do this if don't have a choice.
Aren't they updated numerous times throughout the year instead of once like the iDevices?
http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-graphics-developers-guides/
Read the developer white paper. Intel explicitly said Compute Shader 4.x is support on pg 14 and again on pg 16 when talking about shader capability. Unless you are saying Intel's lying in their developer documentation?
As to OpenCL, it is still ambiguous. I don't believe Intel has explicitly said Sandy Bridge's IGP does not support OpenCL. All they've done is claim Sandy Bridge in general supports OpenCL, which can be interpreted as meaning just CPU software support. Chris Foreman from Ars Technica did claim explicitly that Sandy Bridge's IGP doesn't support OpenCL, but he went as far as claiming Sandy Bridge doesn't support any GPGPU at all which is incorrect due to it's apparent Compute Shader support.
It's is true that DX10.0/DX10.1 hardware does not automatically mean Compute Shader support since AMD's HD2000 (DX10) and HD3000 (DX10.1) don't support CS4.0 or CS4.1. But so far hardware that has claimed CS support has also claimed OpenCL support like the nVidia G80 (DX10/CS4.0) and AMD HD4000 (DX10.1/CS4.1), so hopefully Sandy Bridge will be the same.