Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Obviously they wanted to wipe the phone clean before losing any more information, making it impossible to use the location services. Besides it's not being held hostage, if Apple wanted it back bad enough they would know where to find it.

Isn't 4.0 beta already out and on previous iPhones? Whats to really hide data-wise, its the phone itself thats most valuable in this scenario IMHO.

Unless of course you are a Korean knock-off group wanting to make a quick buck and make fools of people...
 
I'm very surprised at the number of people who like this design. As many who I agree with have already said, the phone has a generic look with none of the elegance previous iphone designs have brought. Comparisons to a brick have been most accurate. Sure, I'll probably buy it because I'm sick of my damn blackberry bold, but come on, where's the inspiration? I sure hope it looks like an actual apple design by release.
 
This has been answered in this thread 50 times and more in other threads: A C&D order is Confirmation that this is real. A C&D at this point would have no use because the cat is already out of the bag. You can't unsee what has already been seen, you can hide the details from the competition because they're already working on assessing how they can compete with Apple based on the leaked information and images.

Apple can only work to dampen the effects of this by either branching away from this prototype and reverting to another one of their prototypes (who thinks they only have one?) or staying the course and accept that any publicity is good publicity.

True, its out of the bag but Apple always acts quickly when something of theirs is leaked on the web. Why was there not one peep from Apple when this thing hit the net? Hmm, I dont know, something just doesnt seem right.
 
It's kinda hard to say how I feel about it. On the one hand, it looks more industrial in design, but, on the other hand, it looks more industrial in design... I'd have to try it out before I could really decide. I suspect, like most Apple designs, it'll grow on you once you start using it. I'm sure they did what they did for a reason.
 
Continues to remind me of a Compaq Presario circa 2006

19287489_1.jpg
 
Isn't 4.0 beta already out and on previous iPhones? Whats to really hide data-wise, its the phone itself thats most valuable in this scenario IMHO.

The software on the phone probably wouldn't be exactly the same as that given to the developers, for one it would probably include some sort of iChat app for the front camera.

Kinda like how the 3GS came with a camera app which wasn't in the 3.0 beta.
 
Yes. 3oz heavier. Barely noticeable and probably explained by the bigger battery.

that's hard to believe. the 3GS weighs 4.8 ounces. a 3 ounce increase would be a 62% gain. you wanna double check your statement? or we should be expecting one helluva battery.

Corrected. Wrong measurement unit. :rolleyes:

Yep, huge battery. Actually the new phone actually looks like a shoe :p

funny! I've gotta get me one of those. maybe a pair. i'd sell my sole to get one ahead of time (pumps fist in anticipation; laces fingers together and flexes). Oops, sorry. No more puns. Those were my last.
 
am i the only person who hated it at first but is now beginning to like it?
 
I guess this is a better place for a more formal critique. Here is my take on this as a designer:

I feel this iteration is a step backwards for a number of reasons. The design as a whole is much less familiar as an iPhone and an Apple product. The classic silver bezel is gone as are the simplistic lines that grace all of Apple's industrial designs. By removing the curved backing, Apple has taken away ergonomic considerations, something they were careful to champion when the first iPhone and even the iPad were released.

Taking this a step further, the transition between the glass front and the aluminum center housing is awkward. Evidence by the close up images provided by Gizmodo, the materials are not flush and come together more like tectonic plates than a finely tuned industrial design. There are also smaller design inconsistencies, including the volume buttons, which no longer have their contexts defined. What this means is that the previous volume rocker made it clear that the top was volume up and the bottom volume down. These new buttons, perhaps to Apple's benefit, are no longer as strictly defined.

Overall, the 3G/3GS seem much more well executed and resolved. I will be disappointed if this turns out to be the real deal, but I am extremely doubtful.


I agree with this critique. I also think the seam in the metal casing is out of character for apple. Its been a very long time since we seen any kind of seams on an Apple product. Overall, it just does feel elegant and refined. The form factor just reminds me of those 90's Nokia phones. Even the buttons have the feel of those old Nokia. despite gizmodo's claim,z I doubt this is real or final design.
 
Why is everybody complaining about visible screws? If I'm not mistaken, the current iPhone models all have visible screws in the exact same places: on the bottom.
 
someone go and explain to me why on earth they didn't turn on the phone?!?!? That could have easily proven if the device was actually a legit apple, at least a prototype! Just showing off the case, which I actually do like, proofs nothing!

Anyone?! Why did they not fire it up?
 
Not really a fan of the design. That aside, this was a terrible hands-on video. He never got out of the way -- his hand was always in the shot -- give us more direct shots instead of all the weird leanings and angles.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.