Although there's not much difference in the single core performance in Geekbench, the scores for multi-core performance are much better for the 3.1GHz i5. Really can't make up my mind!
Although there's not much difference in the single core performance in Geekbench, the scores for multi-core performance are much better for the 3.1GHz i5. Really can't make up my mind!
You are talking about 2%, meaning for instance:
- Assuming that you play videogames with your Mac, it would be 0,3 more FPS. Not worth mentioning.
- Assuming that you earn your salary with it, say you are a video editor, it would be 10" quicker in a 10' video rendering. Assuming that your price per hour is 200 bucks, it would take you 1.800 hours to earn that investment back. Basically after one year you will break even. Unfortunately by then the new model may be out and the depreciation of your used one will be much more than that.
By the way: I got an irresistible offer for a MacBook 12 512 GB and I jumped on it - I postponed my purchase to next year, until the battery problems are solved
Sounds like you've changed your mind from considering the upgrade to the 3.1GHz i5 then. I've now been similarly convinced. I will be ordering the 2.9/16/512 model this evening. Thanks for all your help guys!
Sounds like you've changed your mind from considering the upgrade to the 3.1GHz i5 then. I've now been similarly convinced. I will be ordering the 2.9/16/512 model this evening. Thanks for all your help guys!
From the looks of the benchmarks, it doesn't seem like the i7 is a huge improvement either. And it doesn't have any more cache. Therefore, probably not worth the extra ~£250 it'll cost to upgrade.