Wow, I give you 7 reviews that all point out that it's not taking good quality images compared to other phones that are not under the screen, 1 review shows a 720p image from another phone that does not have it under the screen and that looks superior to the Axon 30. You can bang on about it being 1080p, but due to the screen/sensors, it's not a great quality image, as I have repeatedly stated, yet you ignore.
- 1080 under screen cameras exist. Period. The reviews on the second gen Axon ARE GOOD. The software works out the images and reviewers have been impressed. Not bad for a $400 phone from a company much smaller than Apple.
You have 1 YouTuber says that it was better than expected (again, the title is misleading when you take it out of context, as you seem to have done) within the video he states that it's better than he expected, not that it's better than phones that do not use the same tech. You can see the image is not as good as a front facing camera that's not under the screen. They also show a problem with it using it's image quality enhancement that caused an orange smudge due to it not being able to handle the light source from the lamp.
You've obviously just seen the title of the video, thinking that would prove your point, but as per what you've shown repeatedly, is that you are selective with things to try and support your argument, and then ignoring when you're called out on it, with evidence to the contrary.
Repeating those points, of which point 2 is factually untrue, point 1 shows that there is no room in the notch for the hardware to provide FaceID (due to the fact that the MacBook lid is thinner than the iPhones and iPads - again facts you choose to ignore) & the rest is just immature repetitive behaviour, which is just hysterical.
- The notch only exists because Apple failed to innovate, and itself is missing Face ID and Centre Stage.
- This is a failure.
- When Apple launches products with no notch, you will line up, like many others, and buy them, and never use notch based devices again.
- End of story.
- You will continue to post and argue even though you've stated you won't post anymore, defending Apple who failed in this area.
Since you repeatedly ignore facts & evidence that prove your points to be flawed, you just make this entire thread a joke.
Since you want to repeat your nonsense points, I am going to repeat my evidence that proves your Axon 30 argument to be proof against the point your trying to make. That the technology is getting there, but is not there yet.....
Here's some more reviews from reputable sites, that all say that that the photos from the front camera are just not good enough yet:
Axon 30 GSM Arena Review
Engadget Axon 30 Review
Toms Guide Axon 30 Review - Even has a nice Photo comparison to the Galaxy A52, showing the poor quality of the Axon 30 front camera photos.
TechRadar Axon 30 Review
Android Authority (Included since they are Android focused, it couldn't be stated that they are Apple biased).
Anand Tech Axon 30 Review
Android Central Review
Just since you seemed to have ignored this review the first time around: TechAdvisor
Again, as repeatedly stated, I am not actually defending Apple. If the technology was out there, where a high quality 1080p image, equivalent to a non-under screen camera, existed, then I would actually be complaining to Apple. Since it's not, and since the notch is a minor annoyance, compared to the benefits of the hardware in the MacBook, it's not the issue you make it out to be. A fact which has been proven by the amount of people in this thread, elsewhere in this forum, on Reddit, etc have stated. You seem to repeatedly ignore posts by other people in this thread that tell you real world usage of the hardware, again since you know it proves your overdramatic about it.
I bet you just respond to this, making some lame excuses, or selectively take something out of context thinking it supports your point, and then just repeat a bunch of your bullet points again, as if that proves you right (it doesn't). ? Either way, I don't care, as you've been proven wrong repeatedly.
End of Story, BooksBooks is closed.