Quoted for Truth. Nokia is trying to change licensing terms in order to export triple the amount of money as well as access to Apple's patents.
AApple is the real deal because heart is behind it.
*LTD* said:Nokia's premiere smartphones are nowhere on the level of the iPhone. Nokia has been doing sweet f all for years now, squeezing every last penny they could out of their derivative, aging lineup. Nokia, the most "experienced" company in telco, the "Father" of mobile comnmunications, can't even compete with Android.
Then we see this:
http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/nokia-slashing-smartphone-lineup-in-half-for-2010/
Nokia is bleeding, and it's only going to get worse. What's sad is that they've chosen to litigate their way out of this situation instead of innovate their way out of it. And their timing with all of this speaks volumes.
maybe we would have something faster, that needs less power, if someone else would have had one more time for research.
maybe mobile phones would work as data networks from the beginning, sip/VoIP like, ...
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; en-us; Archos5 Build/Donut) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1)
What? I didn't see anyone crying for Apple to "innovate" their way out" of the recent charger design infringement.
I assume that anyone who infringes on Apple tech are thieves but anything that Apple infringes on is a-ok?
Why don't apple "innovate" themselves some of their own GSM tech?
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; en-us; Archos5 Build/Donut) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1)
Wow. Where will all this end up?
I tink that one of the pioneers of modern telecommunication want what they deserve.
(Cue cries of "Nokia fanboy")
Without Nokia (and the others involved in the development of gsm technology), you wouldn't have an iPhone.
No, this is not the way I read it at all. I read that Apple HAS been paying the licensing for all the patents that are part of the open pooled standards and has been paying the same rate as everyone else; whether this is through the component parts that Apple is sourcing, or it is through separate licensing payments directly to the standards bodies that manage the patents for the individual companies holding the patents, I don't know. Apple would be foolish not to, this is good business practice and Apple do not think they are special.
What seems to be happening is that Nokia decides that Apple is special and demands Apple to pay three times the rate of everyone else. Thus a patent license that is expressly termed "non-discriminatory" suddenly becomes discriminatory against Apple alone. Because Apple is successful and is eating Nokia's lunch, I presume.
Nokia seem to be asking Apple to fork over the difference between the normal rate for the licensing and what they demand that Apple pay over and above everyone else -- and that they are applying this extra retroactively back onto all previous iPhone sales!
Apple fully expects to continue normal licensing the same as everyone else and rightly protests the singling out and discrimination. Nokia blusters and says, well, there are other patents you have violated. Apple disagrees, and says, "prove it."
Apple points out that there are in fact private Apple patents that Nokia are violating; Apple has thus far kept quiet about this, but is forced to bring this up in its own defense. Apple is not discriminating against Nokia by mentioning these patents, because Apple never pooled them into a standard and does not allow anyone to license them.
Nokia know it is in violation of private Apple patents; that is why it has the audacity to demand that Apple hand over its private patents for Nokia to freely use. What cheek!
*LTD* said:Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; en-us; Archos5 Build/Donut) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1)
What? I didn't see anyone crying for Apple to "innovate" their way out" of the recent charger design infringement.
I assume that anyone who infringes on Apple tech are thieves but anything that Apple infringes on is a-ok?
Why don't apple "innovate" themselves some of their own GSM tech?
At face value, Apple is due special treatment for being Apple. The benefit of the doubt has to go somewhere, and it should rightfully go to Apple. Now, getting beyond all that, if they are infringing they're liable to make recompense. Unfortunately, Nokia's timing, their performance over the last two years, and their complete inability to compete, including their ludicrous claim of inlcuding "virtually all" Apple products, speaks volumes and makes Apple look like quite the injured party.
scottness said:Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; en-us; Archos5 Build/Donut) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1)
Wow. Where will all this end up?
I tink that one of the pioneers of modern telecommunication want what they deserve.
(Cue cries of "Nokia fanboy")
Without Nokia (and the others involved in the development of gsm technology), you wouldn't have an iPhone.
if they deserved it, they would have better phones now.
Desperate times call for desperate measures.
IIRC, Apple and RIM have been taking market share from everyone else.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; en-us; Archos5 Build/Donut) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1)
What? I didn't see anyone crying for Apple to "innovate" their way out" of the recent charger design infringement.
I assume that anyone who infringes on Apple tech are thieves but anything that Apple infringes on is a-ok?
Why don't apple "innovate" themselves some of their own GSM tech?
To get some other facts straight, Nokia did approach Apple already in 2007 when first iphone was launched, offering them the same fair and non-discriminating terms everyone else in the industry uses.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; en-us; Archos5 Build/Donut) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1)
This isn't about who has the "best" phone.
Like I said, someone would take issue with it.Wrong, wrong and wrong.
1. Nokia and Apple have had dialogue over this for some time, the filings follow the failure to come to an agreement. Nothing new to see here - industrial fencing over technology. You show me yours and I'll show me mine otherwise I'll take you to court and get yours the hard way or at least some of it boo hoo.
2. All companies love throwing the patent stick, and all the big corps have patent targets each month - you can make a nice bundle in bonuses if you have a good imagination. Apple are no different to anyone else in this area.
Nokia is ahead of Apple by about 3 orders of magnitude in the cellphone market. They are ahead in the technology game with the N900 (vs the 3GS) and Maemo tablets (vs the rumored Apple products).
As I pointed out above in post #24, this is NOT an extension to the first suit.
It is a end run attempt, bypassing the courts and going to the ITC, who has the power to make binding decisions on its own. It can even ban imports of offending devices... and has done so in the past.
Apple has far more to lose with a USA import ban than Nokia would.
Everyone naively thought the same thing in 2007 when the ITC banned import of all CDMA handsets.
Neither the courts nor the president acted to dismiss the ban, either.
Ummm. First of, all companies sue to protect themselves from abusive behavior from competitors, including Apple.
What you are probably are trying to say is that Nokia is dying.... but they aren't... not yet at least.
What seems to be happening is that Nokia decides that Apple is special and demands Apple to pay three times the rate of everyone else.
Apple is in business for one reason and that is profit. There is more profit to be made with the iDevices then desktop computers. If Apple had never entered the iPod/iPhone market it would not the profit maker it is today.
Because, clearly, Apple hasn't made a fortune selling such gadgets.
It's a good thing you aren't in Apple's idea team -- chances are they would have tanked after you convinced them to not make the iPod.
We'll just have to see what the infringement of 10 patents does to that fortune. And how much is left after they payoff Nokia 50-80% of it.
By the time this is over, I have a feeling Apple will wish they'd never gotten away from computers and into iCrap.
And the fanbois will have moved on to the next greatest cheapest piece of crap from China. From someone other than Apple.
![]()
Nokia's premiere smartphones are nowhere on the level of the iPhone.
This isn't black and white. Nokia is ahead of Apple by about 3 orders of magnitude in the cellphone market. They are ahead in the technology game with the N900 (vs the 3GS) and Maemo tablets (vs the rumored Apple products).