Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
As always, when someone does well everyone wants to overthrow and if they can't, they want to ride on the coattails of the successful. Food for thought Nokia, Google and Microsoft, Apple is the real deal because heart is behind it.
 
Quoted for Truth. Nokia is trying to change licensing terms in order to export triple the amount of money as well as access to Apple's patents.

No, not really. The companies who contributed R/D to the consortium that came up with the standards get better rates--Ericsson, for example, pays less, because they helped design/build the system. Apple came in wanting to get a piece of the pie, and Nokia is saying sure--but since they didn't contribute, they have to pay more.
 
Desperate times call for desperate measures.
IIRC, Apple and RIM have been taking market share from everyone else.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; en-us; Archos5 Build/Donut) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1)

*LTD* said:
Nokia's premiere smartphones are nowhere on the level of the iPhone. Nokia has been doing sweet f all for years now, squeezing every last penny they could out of their derivative, aging lineup. Nokia, the most "experienced" company in telco, the "Father" of mobile comnmunications, can't even compete with Android.

Then we see this:

http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/nokia-slashing-smartphone-lineup-in-half-for-2010/

Nokia is bleeding, and it's only going to get worse. What's sad is that they've chosen to litigate their way out of this situation instead of innovate their way out of it. And their timing with all of this speaks volumes.

What? I didn't see anyone crying for Apple to "innovate" their way out" of the recent charger design infringement.

I assume that anyone who infringes on Apple tech are thieves but anything that Apple infringes on is a-ok?

Why don't apple "innovate" themselves some of their own GSM tech?
 
maybe we would have something faster, that needs less power, if someone else would have had one more time for research. :rolleyes:
maybe mobile phones would work as data networks from the beginning, sip/VoIP like, ...

Ooh, the irony being that all Nokia smartphones come with inbuilt SIP stacks already and have done for some years now...unlike Apple. It's not Nokia dragging their feet with implementing modern phone features.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; en-us; Archos5 Build/Donut) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1)



What? I didn't see anyone crying for Apple to "innovate" their way out" of the recent charger design infringement.

I assume that anyone who infringes on Apple tech are thieves but anything that Apple infringes on is a-ok?

Why don't apple "innovate" themselves some of their own GSM tech?

At face value, Apple is due special treatment for being Apple. The benefit of the doubt has to go somewhere, and it should rightfully go to Apple. Now, getting beyond all that, if they are infringing they're liable to make recompense. Unfortunately, Nokia's timing, their performance over the last two years, and their complete inability to compete, including their ludicrous claim of inlcuding "virtually all" Apple products, speaks volumes and makes Apple look like quite the injured party.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; en-us; Archos5 Build/Donut) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1)

Wow. Where will all this end up?

I tink that one of the pioneers of modern telecommunication want what they deserve.

(Cue cries of "Nokia fanboy")

Without Nokia (and the others involved in the development of gsm technology), you wouldn't have an iPhone.

if they deserved it, they would have better phones now.
 
No, this is not the way I read it at all. I read that Apple HAS been paying the licensing for all the patents that are part of the open pooled standards and has been paying the same rate as everyone else; whether this is through the component parts that Apple is sourcing, or it is through separate licensing payments directly to the standards bodies that manage the patents for the individual companies holding the patents, I don't know. Apple would be foolish not to, this is good business practice and Apple do not think they are special.

What seems to be happening is that Nokia decides that Apple is special and demands Apple to pay three times the rate of everyone else. Thus a patent license that is expressly termed "non-discriminatory" suddenly becomes discriminatory against Apple alone. Because Apple is successful and is eating Nokia's lunch, I presume.

Nokia seem to be asking Apple to fork over the difference between the normal rate for the licensing and what they demand that Apple pay over and above everyone else -- and that they are applying this extra retroactively back onto all previous iPhone sales!

Apple fully expects to continue normal licensing the same as everyone else and rightly protests the singling out and discrimination. Nokia blusters and says, well, there are other patents you have violated. Apple disagrees, and says, "prove it."

Apple points out that there are in fact private Apple patents that Nokia are violating; Apple has thus far kept quiet about this, but is forced to bring this up in its own defense. Apple is not discriminating against Nokia by mentioning these patents, because Apple never pooled them into a standard and does not allow anyone to license them.

Nokia know it is in violation of private Apple patents; that is why it has the audacity to demand that Apple hand over its private patents for Nokia to freely use. What cheek!

+1

Play with a lion and it may tolerate it, but try to take away its meat and you can count on getting bitten.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; en-us; Archos5 Build/Donut) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1)

*LTD* said:
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; en-us; Archos5 Build/Donut) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1)



What? I didn't see anyone crying for Apple to "innovate" their way out" of the recent charger design infringement.

I assume that anyone who infringes on Apple tech are thieves but anything that Apple infringes on is a-ok?

Why don't apple "innovate" themselves some of their own GSM tech?

At face value, Apple is due special treatment for being Apple. The benefit of the doubt has to go somewhere, and it should rightfully go to Apple. Now, getting beyond all that, if they are infringing they're liable to make recompense. Unfortunately, Nokia's timing, their performance over the last two years, and their complete inability to compete, including their ludicrous claim of inlcuding "virtually all" Apple products, speaks volumes and makes Apple look like quite the injured party.

The same could apply to Apple when they countersued Nokia. Apple didn't have a problem with the patent infringement until Nokia couldn't reach a deal and went ahead with the original suit.

The tit for tat nature of all this doesn't invalidate any of the issues so far, nor does it mean either party should get off scott free.

I understand this is an Apple oriented forum, but some of the remarks in this thread are well off base.
 
On the patent prosecution and defense front, we have the issue of prior art which often kills even issued patents. As a tactic Apple is likely to go forward with as much as they can there right away to "narrow the issues for the court".

Most patents, no matter how innovative have no commercial value because integrating even a great idea into a product has so many hurtles to overcome, from testing to design, to capitalization, marketing, customer adoption, etc.

It is not until somebody actually gathers together hundreds of ideas and makes a product like an iPod or iPhone, is it even worth it to spend the funds to protect patents. Apple by being very successful is an "attractive target" for patent trolls, patent owners, and also sheisters, and wannabees.

As has been shown by the many patent trolls out there, it is often more profitable to close down productive product operations entirely and devote one's corporate life to intellectual property claims. The law favors it more than producing an actual product, so why not?

Nokia may not get entirely out of product production, but they are about to embark on a path of devoting considerable capital and corporate mind share to lawsuits. Apple tends to fight to the bitter end, even though they do not always win.

Rocketman
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; en-us; Archos5 Build/Donut) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1)

scottness said:
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; en-us; Archos5 Build/Donut) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1)

Wow. Where will all this end up?

I tink that one of the pioneers of modern telecommunication want what they deserve.

(Cue cries of "Nokia fanboy")

Without Nokia (and the others involved in the development of gsm technology), you wouldn't have an iPhone.

if they deserved it, they would have better phones now.

This isn't about who has the "best" phone.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; en-us; Archos5 Build/Donut) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1)



What? I didn't see anyone crying for Apple to "innovate" their way out" of the recent charger design infringement.

I assume that anyone who infringes on Apple tech are thieves but anything that Apple infringes on is a-ok?

Why don't apple "innovate" themselves some of their own GSM tech?

Apple's chargers are not an international standard, now, are they?

When you form an international standard, the landscape changes. In order to get all the cell phone carriers of the world to build infrastructure supporting your standard (GSM, say), you need to exhibit proof that this standard is free from restrictive licenses (meaning, licenses which are not available to competitors under fair and non-discriminatory [FAND] terms). That's the price of entry.

The same type of argument lies under the Microsoft anti-trust lawsuits: the rules change once you become too big to compete.

In general, Apple has stayed away from such situations, whether that be by choice or by circumstance, so there simply is no equivalent for Apple in recent memory. The closest would be the Firewire standard; if you can find anyone suing Apple specifically for jacking up the price of a Firewire license for specific companies or markets, you might have a case there.
 
To get some other facts straight, Nokia did approach Apple already in 2007 when first iphone was launched, offering them the same fair and non-discriminating terms everyone else in the industry uses.

Aapl says otherwise, post a link or like it never happened.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; en-us; Archos5 Build/Donut) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1)



This isn't about who has the "best" phone.

I'm not into entitlements based on things in the past.
 
Wrong, wrong and wrong.

1. Nokia and Apple have had dialogue over this for some time, the filings follow the failure to come to an agreement. Nothing new to see here - industrial fencing over technology. You show me yours and I'll show me mine otherwise I'll take you to court and get yours the hard way or at least some of it boo hoo.

2. All companies love throwing the patent stick, and all the big corps have patent targets each month - you can make a nice bundle in bonuses if you have a good imagination. Apple are no different to anyone else in this area.
Like I said, someone would take issue with it.

Nokia is ahead of Apple by about 3 orders of magnitude in the cellphone market. They are ahead in the technology game with the N900 (vs the 3GS) and Maemo tablets (vs the rumored Apple products).

I stopped reading here. What a stupid statement.
 
As I pointed out above in post #24, this is NOT an extension to the first suit.

It is a end run attempt, bypassing the courts and going to the ITC, who has the power to make binding decisions on its own. It can even ban imports of offending devices... and has done so in the past.

Apple has far more to lose with a USA import ban than Nokia would.



Everyone naively thought the same thing in 2007 when the ITC banned import of all CDMA handsets.

Neither the courts nor the president acted to dismiss the ban, either.

ITC typically acts in the interest of American companies, where's Qualcomm based? The chance that the ITC will make any such ban on products of an American company that have been shipping for years. Zero to None.
 
It would be actually better for Nokia to disappear now,,,

Ummm. First of, all companies sue to protect themselves from abusive behavior from competitors, including Apple.

What you are probably are trying to say is that Nokia is dying.... but they aren't... not yet at least.

then we would remember the good times and not their 21st century agony.
I feel sad that after imposing the only logical and user friendly menu, having the most pleasant materials and the best keyboard lighting just to name a couple of examples, Nokia has not made any step forward.

Nokia has neglected to care about their brand image, closing plants, throwing thousand of employees on the street to produce cheaper further east and now this ridiculous lawsuit

Nokia, you lost it, admit it
 
What seems to be happening is that Nokia decides that Apple is special and demands Apple to pay three times the rate of everyone else.

Nope, Nokia has asked for exactly the same amount (5 percent of revenue), Apple doesn't even deny that. They are just saying that it is to much. Quite a tough argument as 30+ mobile companies agreed to pay the exactly same amount to Nokia before. Even those companies that sued Nokia because of their patents asked for that amount because it's been the standard FRAND amount in the mobile sector. Just Apple didn't want to pay.

So Apple said "Ok, we're not licencing your tech because it's too much for us, we're just stealing it! HAHA!"
 
Apple is in business for one reason and that is profit. There is more profit to be made with the iDevices then desktop computers. If Apple had never entered the iPod/iPhone market it would not the profit maker it is today.

Because, clearly, Apple hasn't made a fortune selling such gadgets.

It's a good thing you aren't in Apple's idea team -- chances are they would have tanked after you convinced them to not make the iPod.

We'll just have to see what the infringement of 10 patents does to that fortune. And how much is left after they payoff Nokia 5-10% of it.

By the time this is over, I have a feeling Apple will wish they'd never gotten away from computers and into iCrap.

And the fanbois will have moved on to the next greatest cheapest piece of crap from China. From someone other than Apple.

:apple:
 
We'll just have to see what the infringement of 10 patents does to that fortune. And how much is left after they payoff Nokia 50-80% of it.

By the time this is over, I have a feeling Apple will wish they'd never gotten away from computers and into iCrap.

And the fanbois will have moved on to the next greatest cheapest piece of crap from China. From someone other than Apple.

:apple:

If you want your tech toys not made in China, another good reason to buy Nokias--the high-end ones are made in Finland ;)
 
Nokia's premiere smartphones are nowhere on the level of the iPhone.

At least the N900 will run some iPhone apps very soon. I wonder why that hasn't been mentioned here or on Engadget as I see a huge flame war coming... Stay tuned :D
 
This isn't black and white. Nokia is ahead of Apple by about 3 orders of magnitude in the cellphone market. They are ahead in the technology game with the N900 (vs the 3GS) and Maemo tablets (vs the rumored Apple products).

Sorry, are you making a Canadian funny? I obviously don't get your sense of humour. :confused:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.